Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 90 Volume Control Cleaning?
#1

Can the volume control on a Philco 90 or 70 be cleaned using standard electronic sprays? I know that some of the older controls (potentiometers) were made by applying a resistive trace on a cardboard like backing. They could easily be damaged by any types of spray lubricants.

For the better part of thirty some years, I have been using WD-40 to lubricate and clean controls and switches with great success. But, I will not use any lubricants on the volume control of my Philco 90 until I find out more about this construction. It appears to me that it might be this earlier type of control. Can anyone provide some info on these?

Thanks,

Ed
#2

Ed

If your 70 (without AVC) or 90 (using two Type 45 output tubes) use the dual type volume control (250 ohms and 5000 ohms), AFAIK, all of these are wirewound and may be safely cleaned with any good contact cleaner.

If your 90 is a "mid" production (1-47) or "late" production (2-47), then it uses a 500K pot that may, or may not, have the resistance on a cardboard-like backing. I honestly do not remember the exact construction of these at this time, although I seem to recall cleaning them with no ill effects.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

My 70 is the non-avc type with the dual controls, so it would be OK to clean and lubricate. The 90 I have is the mid type with the single 47 tube and the 500K pot. I have noticed that the pot looks to have a removable cover on the back of it, which I thought may be indicative of the older style construction. The pot is not noisy so cleaning is not so much of an issue. But, it is very stiff and could use a good dose of lubrication.

Ed
#4

I just went down to the basement and looked at a 90 chassis I have with 1-47 output. It has the 500K pot...and it is an original CTS unit with the Philco part number (5366) stamped on the back. It is also stamped "DO NOT REMOVE COVER"...and they aren't kidding! I could not get the cover to come off...so I cannot confirm or deny your concerns at this time.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

OK Ron,

Thanks. I have to use one of my favorite expressions on this one. ' I'll have to take this under advisement'.

Icon_lol

Ed




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
New Philco Repair Bench
I am sure this is the archive, and not the Chuck's site.morzh — 09:50 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
It's not like we are good friends with that wire and can tell it from other ptetty identical looking wires. Why'n't you...morzh — 09:49 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I'm not sure why that wire wasn't covered in the video. I'm pretty sure the 6A8 won't work until that pin is grounded. Y...RodB — 09:47 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
You'll have to forgive me, I am not sure what you mean.  Can you explain what you are really saying.  If anyone does not...georgetownjohn — 08:05 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Those are details better left to the ones who know. Maybe you disconnected the wrong end of the wire.RodB — 06:22 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Maybe this is starting to make some sense in my hard head.  Is this why the wire in question was not in the great Ron Ra...georgetownjohn — 04:34 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I was correct with the 6A8 pin connection's, 7 and 8 are connected to ground as well as the tube shield (the broken line...RodB — 02:41 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
What does the dotted line representing that surrounds the tube in the schematic?georgetownjohn — 02:17 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Hello John, I have been there either label got lost or was not labeled ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:15 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Sorry, it is a Philco 37-640.  Does that help?--Johngeorgetownjohn — 02:14 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>