Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco vtvom 7001 line caps?
#1

While checking out the vtvom I found it had 62v ac. between the chassis and earth ground. Did not matter which way it was plugged in.
It has 2 -.25 line bypass caps from the primary of transformer to chassis.
 Put an 1000 ohm resistor between the chassis and earth ground and measured across it and have 12 volts. So I cut the ground side of the .25 caps and jumpered in 2-.01 Y-type disc safety caps. It now reads 51v ac chassis to earth ground and.05v ac across the resistor.
 Two questions I need help with.
 Is the 51v with the new caps a phantom voltage?
Can I use the .01 safety caps to replace the .25 caps or should I order the larger value safety caps?
 Any help greatly appreciated.
#2

Quote:Can I use the .01 safety caps to replace the .25 caps or should I order the larger value safety caps?


Yes, the .01mf is sufficient bypass without having an excessive AC line current pass-through. A higher value of .03mf could, with other equipment on the same GFI branch circuit, cause a nuisance tripping of the circuit breaker.  The OEM value of .25mf is extreme by todays standards. Such a value even with NEW "Y" capacitors would give an uncomfortable tickle and under certain conditions a disturbing shock, if accidentally combined with another device in use the shock could be very hazardous. For the VTVOM it could make low level AC voltage measurements impossible.

I do not know the instrument being repaired, if it has a power transformer, the windings can be leaking to the core. That would be a problem, an open style transformer can be disassembled and the core more effectively insulated to reduce the shock. However the primary could be leaking to the secondary and often that is in direct reference to the chassis. If so, then the transformer would have to be replaced.

YMMV

Chas

Pliny the younger
“nihil novum nihil varium nihil quod non semel spectasse sufficiat”
#3

Thanks Chas. Went ahead and put the .01 safety caps in it. The tester does have a transformer so I'll check it for possible primary to secondary leakage.




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Today I've been reading through the site trying to learn more about this radio. I also soldered the lose power cord cabl...osanders0311 — 08:24 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
Thanks David! I do have that same later prodution model 610 schematic. I've also studied the Philco service bulletins fo...Tubester — 08:12 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
Some info from Beitmans says late production. David   David — 06:06 PM
Restoring Philco 96
Oh wow! Just found this thread.  Brings me back to early days on this phorum.  I did a 96 back in 2017.  Thread here: ...rfeenstra — 06:05 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
Thanks for the replies. It's not the really the hum that I am after. Just trying to understand why only the shortwave ba...Tubester — 04:01 PM
Restoring Philco 96
70 and 90 are Superhets, but at least the 2x45 model of 90 uses the Plate detector (and so does 70). Also the Atwaters,...morzh — 03:28 PM
Restoring Philco 96
Morzh, Prayers for your mom. I am sure that there was enough pain living through the Holocaust as a child. I pray dail...MrFixr55 — 02:19 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
Hi Dan, Divide and conquer. First off trry to differentiate between 60Hz and 120 Hz hum. 120 Hz hum has a higher pit...MrFixr55 — 01:49 PM
Restoring Philco 96
Yes, other than takin a toll on your back, they are undeed way more repair friendly than many other Philcos. To me, som...morzh — 01:04 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
If the wires look like they were this way from the factory (very neat and very dull soldering joints), I'd leave them be...morzh — 12:58 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2862 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2860 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>