Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

44B vs. 144B dial differences?
#1

I recently acquired a Philco 144B that has suffered a catastrophic dial cleaning.

I see that RadioDaze sells part# 27-5028 dial scale for the 44B, but they do not list part# 27-5044 dial scale for the 144B.

The band coverage listed in Riders is identical for both radios, on all 4 bands.

Can anyone tell me what the differences are between the two dials, and whether they are interchangeable?

Thanks!
Rodney
#2

That is a Bummer , maybe one turns up on the Bay or maybe a mark Oppat question, he has lots of parts? A wanted post on other forum maybe?

Paul

Tubetalk1
#3

I don't believe there is any difference, other than whether (or not) the dial is the same for the later 144s since they use a different tuning mechanism.

I have a 44B but no 144 to go by.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#4

Hi, that's a good point, Ron. Even though the markings are the same, the slot for the tuning shaft could be a different width. I hadn't thought of that.

I will have to pull it out of the cabinet this weekend and make some measurements. Thanks!
#5

Well, I just got back to this after a few weeks, and it looks like the dials are definitely different.

I think the hash marks and numerals for the different frequencies are identical between the 44 and 144.

However, the keyhole cutout for mounting the 144 dial appears to be much larger than than the keyhole for the 44B.  I measured it at 2.32" diameter as installed.

Also, while the freq. markings are the same, some of the ancillary markings are different from those shown at Radio Daze.  For instance, in the 11.5 - 12.0 MHz range, the 44 dial says "SW Broadcast."  The 144 dial says "-------- SW ---------".  Some of the ship, amateur, phone markings are not on the 144 dial at all.


Attached Files Image(s)
   




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, maybe - maybe not  :lol: It's been an interesting project so far! Something so simple, yet so cranky. The 1st one ...TV MAN — 05:12 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteres in a while  https://www.radionostalgia.ca/lib/Images/battery/us/burgess1D.jpgi ...Vlad95 — 03:50 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Measure the voltages first, just in case.morzh — 02:19 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteries in a while Mr. Fixer. Boston Edison always used Burgess in their Bright Star yellow...Paul Philco322 — 02:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thanks Sam. I'll let you know. I can probably scare some up from the local radio club.klondike98 — 02:07 PM
Philco 89 Code 123 Osc Coil
Hello,  I thought I would post my findings on my bad oscillator tickler coil. There were 27 turns on the outer coil b...dconant — 12:38 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Thanks Morzh. So it appears I did wire it incorrectly and I have to switch the wires between pins 2 and 4.bobclausen — 09:24 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
No, it's not a problem, just during certain condition it could show up. Yes, an internal tube short could do that too. ...morzh — 09:13 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
You sound guys are never satisfied. :crazy: :clap:RodB — 09:10 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
I got some new ceramic octal tube sockets installed and also tried some different coupling caps.  The results:  The go...TV MAN — 08:42 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1394 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1393 Guest(s)
Avatar

>