Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Another 48-482 (cabinet)
#1

Today I began work on the cabinet of the 48-482 whose electronics I just finished. The cabinet had the usual scuffs and scratches on its outside, and on the top there was an area about 2 1/2 inches in diameter where the finish was beginning to "buckle" as if someone had left something damp on there, but not bad enough to discolor the wood itself. I didn't want to completely strip the cabinet since the faux finish on the front control panel and the decals were perfect, so I tried something else. Minwax maxes a product called "Antique Furniture Re-finisher. It is a combination of three solvents. It re-softens the old finish when it is applied. It is applied with 0000 steel wool, and, depending on how vigorously you go at it, you can remove just a little of the old finish and redistribute the rest, or keep going and remove as much as you like. I chose to just do the minimum necessary to spread finish over the scratches, and fix the "buckled" finish on the top. While the finish is wet with the re-finisher you can get an idea of what the wood will look like when the piece is all done, but when the piece dries after working it with the re-finisher, and re-spreading the old finish, it is going to look TERRIBLE when it dries ! Hazy and swirly ain't in it! DON'T fret ! Once it dried, and it dried very quickly because of the kinds of solvents used, I sanded the surface lightly with 320 grit  just to get off any little nubbins from the steel wool. Then I put on the first coat of tung oil finish. It looks great already. All the haziness is gone, the scratches are gone, the finish is smoothed and evened out. No damage to the decals, they look fine A couple more coats and this radio is going to look GREAT ! I just thought I'd let folks know about my experience. It's another tool to add to the toolbox.




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
Some info from Beitmans says late production. David   David — 06:06 PM
Restoring Philco 96
Oh wow! Just found this thread.  Brings me back to early days on this phorum.  I did a 96 back in 2017.  Thread here: ...rfeenstra — 06:05 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
Thanks for the replies. It's not the really the hum that I am after. Just trying to understand why only the shortwave ba...Tubester — 04:01 PM
Restoring Philco 96
70 and 90 are Superhets, but at least the 2x45 model of 90 uses the Plate detector (and so does 70). Also the Atwaters,...morzh — 03:28 PM
Restoring Philco 96
Morzh, Prayers for your mom. I am sure that there was enough pain living through the Holocaust as a child. I pray dail...MrFixr55 — 02:19 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
Hi Dan, Divide and conquer. First off trry to differentiate between 60Hz and 120 Hz hum. 120 Hz hum has a higher pit...MrFixr55 — 01:49 PM
Restoring Philco 96
Yes, other than takin a toll on your back, they are undeed way more repair friendly than many other Philcos. To me, som...morzh — 01:04 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
If the wires look like they were this way from the factory (very neat and very dull soldering joints), I'd leave them be...morzh — 12:58 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
I managed to open up the Expander Unit and replace the grid cap wires. Tested the connections found they looked good and...dconant — 12:19 PM
610B Oscillator Questions
I've included a picture of the 'actual' schematic I created. I double checked several times and it appears to be accur...Tubester — 09:26 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2851 online users. [Complete List]
» 4 Member(s) | 2847 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar

>