Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Modern signal generators
#1

As most of you know, I invested in a Siglent SDG1032X function generator a few years ago after using an old Clough-Brengle for decades, then a B+K 4040 like John B's for a while.

Pros of the Siglent: Direct digital readout, no drifting.
Con of the Siglent: Output level too high for typical vintage radios, must be reduced to a usable level with the use of inline BNC attenuators. I am using three such attenuators, a 20 dB, another 20 dB, and a 14 dB to reduce the output signal by 54 dB. This has solved my "signal too strong" issue.

While I liked my B+K 4040, I did not like the fact that it, too, drifted in frequency while in use. Of course, the old 1930s Clough-Brengle drifted badly.

With the setup I have now, I am able to give my radios the best alignments possible. I recently had my RCA C15-3 console chassis out for a tuneup. The IF alignment was good already, but I was able to improve the RF alignment a good deal.

I'll ask this question - do the HP generators produce a low level signal usable in vintage receivers without overloading them?

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#2

The sole problem with mine is, it is about 50 lbs or so, and moving it to the table and back poses the risk of back problems.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

Ron,

The HP generators I had to leave behind would easily go below the thresholds of any radio I worked on (-134dB?)
#4

morzh Wrote:The sole problem with mine is, it is about 50 lbs or so

50 lbs? That's a lightweight. My General Radio Type 805-C Standard Signal Generator weighs 117-1/2 lbs. I like to joke that if a tornado takes my house the workbench will still be there because of the 805-C holding it down.

Dale H. Cook, GR/HP/Tek Collector, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
https://plymouthcolony.net/starcity/radios/
#5

Ron Ramirez Wrote:I am using three such attenuators, a 20 dB, another 20 dB, and a 14 dB to reduce the output signal by 54 dB.

Ron - The HP 355C (0-12dB in 1 dB steps) and 355D (0 to 120dB in 10dB steps) step attenuators are more elegant solutions. I have long owned both, largely for use with GR unit oscillators which lack step attenuators.


Ron Ramirez Wrote:... do the HP generators produce a low level signal usable in vintage receivers without overloading them?

They do - around less than 0.1 microvolt into 50 ohms is not unusual.

Dale H. Cook, GR/HP/Tek Collector, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
https://plymouthcolony.net/starcity/radios/




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Tim, nice write up and thanks for sharing !! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:47 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, this was a real "Hum-Dinger" :lol: ! This will be kinda long, but hopefully it will help others having t...TV MAN — 01:55 AM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
3D-printing...short of machining, of course. Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>