Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

RF coil wire
#1

I am curious about wire size for rewinding rf coils. It seems that the primary wire size is smaller....e.g. #38 vs. the secondary wire around #32 awg. This seems counterintuitive and I was wondering why. What is the principle involved here? I presume it is not a' step up or step down ' relationship, or is it??? And sometimes it appears that the wires are the same size for both primary and secondary sections.
#2

IMO, its more a matter of fitting the turns on a reasonably sized form. I had to rewind one (BCB) recently in a 30s era radio and it seemed like the original was around 34-36ga. All I had was 30 and 38. 30 wouldn't fit but it did turn out ok with 38 although I had to tweak it quite a bit with my AADE L/C meter. There was 15-20 turns of difference.

The problem in doing like I did going from 34 to 38 was there's a difference in the distributed capacitance. So although the inductance came out ok, it didn't track as well as the original.

Using 38 when you can do the job on the smaller secondary with 32 simply introduces more production issues. Icon_smile
#3

Exray: gracias...my project is an Audiola 31 TRF. I have been trying to get info. on rf coils. A couple of questions: how successful is coil rewinding in general, without the sophisticated equipment you seem to have? When you tweak it, does that mean adding extra wraps or removing them? How is that done...since you almost have to hook everything up for test....I mean is there an easy way to do this without a total redo? Can you tell if primary is not correct enough? Any tips greatly appreciated.
#4

exray Wrote:IMO, its more a matter of fitting the turns on a reasonably sized form. I had to rewind one (BCB) recently in a 30s era radio and it seemed like the original was around 34-36ga. All I had was 30 and 38. 30 wouldn't fit but it did turn out ok with 38 although I had to tweak it quite a bit with my AADE L/C meter. There was 15-20 turns of difference.

The problem in doing like I did going from 34 to 38 was there's a difference in the distributed capacitance. So although the inductance came out ok, it didn't track as well as the original.

Using 38 when you can do the job on the smaller secondary with 32 simply introduces more production issues. Icon_smile
Anyone interested in fixing an antenna coil out of a Philco model 76?
I am too chicken to attempt this,and can't seem to find a replacement.
Thanks, Murf
#5

sjhs1962 Wrote:Exray: gracias...my project is an Audiola 31 TRF. I have been trying to get info. on rf coils. A couple of questions: how successful is coil rewinding in general, without the sophisticated equipment you seem to have? When you tweak it, does that mean adding extra wraps or removing them? How is that done...since you almost have to hook everything up for test....I mean is there an easy way to do this without a total redo? Can you tell if primary is not correct enough? Any tips greatly appreciated.

Hi, yes, I have seen your posts on the other forum.
If you use the same gauge of wire, and the same number of turns, and fill up the same coil length then your rewound coil should be no different than the original. Of course that is easier said than done. If you try to bump up/down the wire gauge by even one step it becomes 'interesting' and will require some tweaking adjustment.

As I recall, yours was a multi-stage TRF set. (Three stages? ) Now, with a single stage circuit like a crystal radio or regen radio (or a simple RF coil in a Philco) you can wiggle around at will but when all three stages need to complement each other then precision is needed. The older Three-Dialers were built that way just for that reason, the operator had control of the tuning of each stage. But when they are ganged together by a common tuning capacitor gang...well, you can see the difficulty.

No sophisticated equipment here Icon_smile Just an AADE meter. I do a lot of homebrewing so for the $100 cost it serves me well and I couldn't live without it. Helps out on old radios too! But aside from plonking down 100 bucks I suggest reviewing your rewound coils to see how closely they resemble the originals if you still have the data handy. Its much easier to fork over a few dollars for the correct gauge wire if that is in question. (I ordered some 34 and 36 to have on hand after my recent quandry)

To answer your specific questions. Tweaking, yes, using the AADE meter while adding or subtracting turns. There is no reliable alternative. If it were one coil out of three you might be able to tweak it by trial and error but I recall all three of yours were open.

Primary is usually not all that critical in interstage RF transformers. You achieve resonance with the larger secondary (grid circuit). The turns ratio relationship should remain the same regardless of the wire size (more or less).

Hope this helps.
#6

Exray....thanks and yes your posts help and all advice helps. I have ordered some wire and have setup a rudimentary rewinding apparatus. So I will give it my best shot. I am hopeful to hear a station and will proclaim it a great success. I will let you know.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
48-482 rear panel help
Hi Keith, here is an article that covers different FM detector circuits including a section on the theory and alignment ...462ron — 08:26 AM
462ron
Well then Dan I guess this old man’s memory wasn’t too foggy :lolno: although I couldn’t remember where I saw that upgra...462ron — 08:08 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Fortunately, I did not have to do much to my GE S-22 (RCA R7A) Almost all caps and the 2 audio transformers packed into...MrFixr55 — 07:44 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Yup Arran is correct it is missing the pushbutton covers. I don't know where they all go but it's a common issue on this...Radioroslyn — 06:48 AM
48-482 rear panel help
I also have one of these, again it never had a back, and no trace of one. I have been told that the pushbuttons used to ...Arran — 03:29 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks Joseph. Hope you get to restore your 48-482 before too long!keithchip — 02:12 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
RCAs ain't no cake either.morzh — 10:32 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
After a couple of days worth of troubleshooting my signal generator, I gave up. The oscilloscope still worked fine, so I...jrblasde — 09:51 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Yes, I can confirm. I bought one (haven’t restored it yet) which didn’t have a back panel.jrblasde — 09:37 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Try a 39-116.Radioroslyn — 09:24 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 878 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 876 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>