Posts: 2,023
Threads: 365
Joined: Jun 2010
City: Dover, OH
About four or five years ago I aquired this radio from a friend of a friend after a failed attempt at getting a big Zenith console. Today I dragged it out after a year of sitting and got it going again and man, it still can kick a Zenith's butt! A rather nice radio that can shake a room on the right channel and with the controlls set up right! Also all the tubes but the eye tube in this thing are metal, which might be bad if you like the glow of tubes. I forgot how much I loved this set and it really shows RCA at thier best. Great tone and you can even get those electric highs from the 80's pop songs with the tone switch flipped clear over to Full Fidelity.
Anyways, now that I am done gushing, it does have one minor issue that it has had for years. The eye tube lights, but doesn't react. Is there a resistor in the eye tube socket that needs replaced or could it be something else?
No matter where you go, there you are.
Posts: 4,639
Threads: 51
Joined: Sep 2008
City: Sandwick, BC, CA
Jayce;
There is a 1,000,000 ohm resistor inside the base of the eye tube socket that is connected between the plate and the target, if it is burned out the tube will not react. Originally they used a 1/4 Watt resistor in this location but use the largest Wattage resistor that you can fit under that cap between the two tube pins, like a 1/2 Watt or better. There are also some other circuits that could cause it not to respond, the tube is driven by AVC voltage so a bad capacitor could also cause that condition. Also if some placed a 6U5 or 6G5 Magic Eye in place of a 6E5 the shadow will react somewhat but not close completely, if you place a 6E5 in place of a 6U5/6G5 the side of the shadow will overlap when closed, the grid bias voltages are different.
Regards
Arran
(This post was last modified: 07-03-2012, 10:29 PM by Arran.)
Posts: 2,023
Threads: 365
Joined: Jun 2010
City: Dover, OH
Hmm, ok. I think this radio still has the 6E5 tube in it if I recall right. Nice and strong yet. I'll check on that resistor.
No matter where you go, there you are.
Posts: 4,639
Threads: 51
Joined: Sep 2008
City: Sandwick, BC, CA
Jayce;
By the way, with regard to it kicking a brand Z set's butt I'm not surprised. RCA, much like Philco, put a lot of money into engineering, research, and development, on top of that they also benefited from the developments coming out of G.E's research department from time to time as well. RCA thought of themselves as the industry standard and backed it up with solid no nonsense products. Performance came first, styling came second, marketing came third.
Brand Z came up with flashy styling and marketing gimicks, chassis with metalic paint stuffed with lots of tubes, impressive looks, and marketing gimmicks, you can tell that their boss was a car salesman. Unfortunately he couldn't keep his nose out of the engineering department so they ended up with stupid things like undersized power transformers, extra rectifier tubes, using three tubes where RCA would have used one, etc., it was all about making the sale. Even in the 1000Z Stratosphere it was as though the front end for the short wave bands was an afterthought, it's actually quite embarassing given that they were supposed to be the flagship model. It wasn't that they couldn't make a decent set, the Transoceanics prove that, it's just that they had an autocratic layman, who didn't know one end of a soldering iron from another, micromanaging everything.
Philco on the other hand, was run by a former chemical engineer, RCA by a former radiotelegraph operator, neither were marketing men but understood the importance of producing the best performing product for the price.
Regards
Arran
Posts: 2,023
Threads: 365
Joined: Jun 2010
City: Dover, OH
Autocratic layman, seems to be who runs most corporations nowdays. One thing I do have to say I like about Brand Z is that they did seem to do better in the postwar years, considering how all radio designs went downhill once TV got going. Even that hit issues as everyone switched to circuit boards in the mid 50's and we have all heard the horror stories of those. Zenith stuck with a hand-wired, metal chassis in thier sets and at least the black and white sets seem fairly rugged and there is now worry of pulling the tube sockets out with the tubes! (A friend of mine just had this happen to a little set with the phelonic boards in it. Went to replace a tube and the board basically crumbled.)
No matter where you go, there you are.
Posts: 4,639
Threads: 51
Joined: Sep 2008
City: Sandwick, BC, CA
Quote:Autocratic layman, seems to be who runs most corporations nowdays. One thing I do have to say I like about Brand Z is that they did seem to do better in the postwar years, considering how all radio designs went downhill once TV got going. Even that hit issues as everyone switched to circuit boards in the mid 50's and we have all heard the horror stories of those. Zenith stuck with a hand-wired, metal chassis in thier sets and at least the black and white sets seem fairly rugged and there is now worry of pulling the tube sockets out with the tubes! (A friend of mine just had this happen to a little set with the phelonic boards in it. Went to replace a tube and the board basically crumbled.)
It's actually worse then that, most corporations seems to be run by comittees of MBA and accountant types, at least the old autocrats like Eugene MacDonald had a long term vision for the companies they ran and had an interest in keeping them successful, not simply an exit stratagy for themselves. I agree about the post war brand Zs, I don't know if it was the failures of the early 40s sets, the post war television boom, or the success of the Transoceanic sets but they seemed to have pulled their socks up during that time. They did do some stupid things with their early TVs though, like series string filaments with the plate voltages supplied by an autotransformer, or overdriving the flyback circuits by using two horizontal output tubes. Some of their radio and combo units also used an autotransformer, again more stupid corner cutting. I think they finally straightened things out after the "Commander" retired because the late 50s to early 80s brand Z TVs are some of the best TVs ever made.
Regards
Arran
(This post was last modified: 07-04-2012, 02:19 AM by Arran.)
Posts: 2,023
Threads: 365
Joined: Jun 2010
City: Dover, OH
The only issue I have had with postwar brand Z radios are the IFs. Of course, that seemed to be an issue with alot of radios, especially the 50's ones I have found. I hear you about the MBAs and such running companies nowadays. It's all short term gains and run away inflation as a result. Ah, for the days when stuff was made and companies made for the long term. No way we can rebuild today's crap like we can these old radios we love.
No matter where you go, there you are.
Posts: 7,248
Threads: 266
Joined: Dec 2009
City: Roslyn Pa
Hey Jayce,
I had a set with the same problem the eye tube wouldn't light and that drove me crazy. It was a National NC-100X. A nice looking deco communication receiver from 1936 with P/P 6F6's and a xtal filter.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/42774321@N0...otostream/
I had just finished up recapping it and checking all of the resistors except for the one on the eye toob. Couldn't find the darn thing and I had the shop manual for but I could find that resistor for anything. It wasn't listed on the pictorial and like Arran said it was inside the base of the 6E5 socket. I replaced it and was back in business.
GL Terry
(This post was last modified: 07-04-2012, 09:15 PM by Radioroslyn.)
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
bridkarl
|
I have two PT-6 chassis. On both there is a blue wire that runs from the above chassis transformer to pin 6 of 7C6. So t...bridkarl — 07:23 PM |
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
|
Joseph, now you are an engineer!!RodB — 06:37 PM |
PT-6 antenna connections
|
Hi, reading your explanation I can see the confusion. If you take it one connection at a time it should result in a desi...RodB — 06:34 PM |
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
|
It works! I received the PCBs this morning in the mail, and put everything together. I reused the base from the original...jrblasde — 04:32 PM |
PT-6 antenna connections
|
I seem to have lost my way on this PT-6.
I see the antenna aerial transformer schematic - I’m reading pins 1 through ...bridkarl — 12:30 PM |
40-150 General questions
|
Good thing you're a good electrician ... the pictures show a lot of rewiring in your future! Take care and BE HEALTHY!...GarySP — 11:52 AM |
40-150 General questions
|
I think RobB has it right. It is a part number and looks like its stamped on the chassis and that wasn't something you ...klondike98 — 11:41 AM |
40-150 General questions
|
It's most likely a part number. Most of Philco part numbers are in that format. I looked at the parts list for this mode...RodB — 08:10 AM |
40-150 General questions
|
Hi Kevin,
No, I don't but I like your Quote about being a good electrician. The way I look at it is "The fact ...MrFixr55 — 08:06 AM |
Philco 38-7 Speaker
|
7K should be fine. While not a perfect match (This transformer is meant for 6V6 tubes), Antique Electronic Supply (AES)...MrFixr55 — 08:03 AM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 3065 online users. [Complete List] » 2 Member(s) | 3063 Guest(s)
|
|
|
![>](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/bootbb/asb/right_arrow.png)
|