Philco 112 mystery - need help
Posts: 234
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2008
City: Mission Viejo, CA
The schematics are here: http://www.nostalgiaair.org/Resources/118/M0013118.htm
The mystery involves what capacitor values seem reasonable in specific circuit locations. Why? The schematics in Riders Volume two have two different number schemes for the capacitor block (can)!
If you look at the bottom diagram on Philco Page 2-36, you will see the top row, from left to right is 5, 3, 1 and the bottom row is 6, 4, 2. If you then go to Page Philco 2-38 you will see that the top row is 1, 2, 3 and the bottom row is unlabeled ground, 5, 6.
This leaves us with a need to study the circuit and decide which values seem most reasonable in the various locations. That is where I need your help. Specifically:
1) For the capacitor from the low end of the volume control to ground, is 0.5 or 0.15 more reasonable?
2) For the capacitor from after the field coil to ground, does it seem more reasonable that it would be 1.0 or 0.5?
3) For the capacitor from the second (screen) grid of the last '24A tube to ground (across a resistor), does it seem best if it is 0.5 or 1.0?
4) The capacitor from the B+ feed to the primary of the audio push-pull driver transformer is 0.5 either way.
5) For the capacitor connected from the high voltage winding center tap to ground, does it seem more reasonable that the value would be 0.015 or that it would be 0.5 for the 60 cycle radios and 1.5 for the 25 cycle radios?
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Hi Stephen,
You want to look at the schematics and service data for the Model 112 above serial number 174001 (which is the 2-47 version). I don't have access to any of my stuff as I'm at work on lunch, but I believe the data on Rider's Philco page 2-38 is correct for your set. Almost everything above that is for the early 112 with 2-45 tubes, below S/N 174001 - the exception being, as you mentioned, the under-chassis drawing at the bottom of Philco page 2-36.
It's hard to make out in the scan, but you're right - the numbering scheme of the terminals are different in the 2-36 drawing than the 2-38 drawing. However, I am pretty sure that the capacitor layout in 2-38 is correct.
I will look at my notes when I get home to confirm, and to be able to properly answer your questions.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
[Image: http://www.philcoradio.com/images/phorum/schem/112b.jpg]
Click here to see the full-size version.
This drawing is correct. I once owned a late version 112 (112X to be exact) so I am somewhat familiar with it even though it has been several years since I let it go.
On a somewhat different subject but on topic with the late version 112, please note resistor (51). This is rated at 15K, 2 watts. It was running at its design maximum in 1931, and with today's higher line voltage, it is really going to be stressed out. I recommend that you replace it with a 5 or 7 watt resistor to give it a greater margin of safety and to keep it from burning out prematurely on today's higher line voltage.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 234
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2008
City: Mission Viejo, CA
Thanks!
I wonder why they needed (wanted) such a large capacitor (1 MFD) from the screen grid of the last '24 tube to ground?
The center tapped wire wound resistor between the center tap and ground would carry all of what goes through the resistor you mentioned, plus other loads, so I wonder if it is adequate?
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
1 uF does seem a bit overkill, but that's one of those questions you would have to ask a dead guy (someone on Philco's engineering team). And dead men tell no tales.
Actually, someone like Mike (morzh) could probably answer that question. What say you, Mike, if you're watching?
Now regarding resistor (69), the dual 70 ohm resistor with the center tap. It is connected between B- and ground, where the potential between high voltage center tap (B-) and ground is low. Low voltage, low resistance (70 + 70 = 140 ohms), low current.
Resistor (51), on the other hand, is connected between B+ and ground. A lot of Philco chassis used a resistor between B+ and ground in this manner, but in other Philcos the wattage of this resistor is much greater. In fact, the others (including 111, early 112, 16, 17, 18, and others) used a very large tubular resistor which was probably at least a 20 or 25 watt resistor. I don't know why Philco used such a small resistor in the late 112, unless the bean counters were trying to cut costs. They should have used something more sturdy than a 2 watt resistor in this position. If that resistor is even still in the ballpark (and it is highly doubtful), it will run red hot in operation. Replacement with a 5, 7 or even 10 watt resistor will result in a resistor that will still generate heat but will last much longer.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 234
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2008
City: Mission Viejo, CA
I had already obtained a 10 watt 15,000 ohm resistor to use in that position. The one in the chassis when I got it is much larger than 2 watts. I do not know the size, but I have some measurement data for the old resistors and it is at least twice,as long and twice the diameter of a two watt resistor. I have no way to know if it is original.
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Philco may have changed that resistor to 3 watts, still too small for that application.
10 watts should do quite well.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 234
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2008
City: Mission Viejo, CA
It is playing, so it seems the values work.
Posts: 234
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2008
City: Mission Viejo, CA
The secondary of the 3rd IF was open. A surprising amount of signal was still was making it through.
Users browsing this thread:
|
Recent Posts
|
bridkarl
|
I have two PT-6 chassis. On both there is a blue wire that runs from the above chassis transformer to pin 6 of 7C6. So t...bridkarl — 07:23 PM |
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
|
Joseph, now you are an engineer!!RodB — 06:37 PM |
PT-6 antenna connections
|
Hi, reading your explanation I can see the confusion. If you take it one connection at a time it should result in a desi...RodB — 06:34 PM |
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
|
It works! I received the PCBs this morning in the mail, and put everything together. I reused the base from the original...jrblasde — 04:32 PM |
PT-6 antenna connections
|
I seem to have lost my way on this PT-6.
I see the antenna aerial transformer schematic - I’m reading pins 1 through ...bridkarl — 12:30 PM |
40-150 General questions
|
Good thing you're a good electrician ... the pictures show a lot of rewiring in your future! Take care and BE HEALTHY!...GarySP — 11:52 AM |
40-150 General questions
|
I think RobB has it right. It is a part number and looks like its stamped on the chassis and that wasn't something you ...klondike98 — 11:41 AM |
40-150 General questions
|
It's most likely a part number. Most of Philco part numbers are in that format. I looked at the parts list for this mode...RodB — 08:10 AM |
40-150 General questions
|
Hi Kevin,
No, I don't but I like your Quote about being a good electrician. The way I look at it is "The fact ...MrFixr55 — 08:06 AM |
Philco 38-7 Speaker
|
7K should be fine. While not a perfect match (This transformer is meant for 6V6 tubes), Antique Electronic Supply (AES)...MrFixr55 — 08:03 AM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 2961 online users. [Complete List] » 2 Member(s) | 2959 Guest(s)
|
|
|
![>](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/bootbb/asb/right_arrow.png)
|