Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

B+ voltage discrepancies between rect tubes
#1

Have two NOS tubes one is a US NAVY 5Y3 and the other is a ken rad 5Y3. The radio works fine with either but is this a common issue for these types of tubes? Let me know what you fellas think.
US NAVY 
Audio B+ 280
Rect B+ over 300 my meter only goes to 300
Rf, if, det, B+ 201
-------------------------------------
Ken rad
Audio B+ 249
Rect B+ 302
Rf, if, det, B+ 179
#2

Recently I’ve tested and swapped tubes in a few radios to get the best performance, or at least the theory that my radio is working better. I’ve measured AVC and Power Supply voltages too.

I’ve seen certain brands like National Union NIB and the like test not as good as some major brands. I think the way tubes were mass produced, they had minimum specs to meet, and if they did, out they went for sale. Military tubes are supposed to be built to better standards, so it’s possible that they can test better.

The bottom line, unless it’s a high end amplifier that needs matched pairs, most tubes are fine. Most radios will never notice the difference, even with a weak tube. You’d be surprised how good a radio with weak 45’s can still sound.

Tony

“People may not remember how fast you did a job, but they will remember how well you did it”
#3

What does schematic give for B+ reading?

US Navy mfg'd by?

May be a 5Y3/6087?

Tom
#4

says C.H.S. on the navy tube.
#5

CHS should be Chatham, basically Tung-Sol's division that produced mil spec and other speciality tubes.

Without knowing voltage specs, no clue if one is high or other is low. Not uncommon for B+ to vary 5-10v on different new tubes but 30v is excessive.

Tom




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
It works! I received the PCBs this morning in the mail, and put everything together. I reused the base from the original...jrblasde — 04:32 PM
PT-6 antenna connections
I seem to have lost my way on this PT-6. I see the antenna aerial transformer schematic - I’m reading pins 1 through ...bridkarl — 12:30 PM
40-150 General questions
Good thing you're a good electrician ... the pictures show a lot of rewiring in your future! Take care and BE HEALTHY!...GarySP — 11:52 AM
40-150 General questions
I think RobB has it right. It is a part number and looks like its stamped on the chassis and that wasn't something you ...klondike98 — 11:41 AM
40-150 General questions
It's most likely a part number. Most of Philco part numbers are in that format. I looked at the parts list for this mode...RodB — 08:10 AM
40-150 General questions
Hi Kevin, No, I don't but I like your Quote about being a good electrician. The way I look at it is "The fact ...MrFixr55 — 08:06 AM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
7K should be fine. While not a perfect match (This transformer is meant for 6V6 tubes), Antique Electronic Supply (AES)...MrFixr55 — 08:03 AM
40-150 General questions
I discovered a stamp on the underside of the breadboard on my Philco 40-150. It is"56-1417' in black ink with numbe...Kevin_D — 07:14 AM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
FYI the Impedance of the HR20 (the one I have) secondary of the audio transformer is 5 ohms. The 38-7XX speaker is suppo...tludka — 04:22 PM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
Yeah, don't use the transformer currently on the H-20 (Dopf, I thought "H20, is that new technology, a speaker usin...MrFixr55 — 03:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2726 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2724 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>