Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Echophone model s3 no sound
#1

Working on the 5 tube version (three 24's, a 45 and 80) of the 1930 Echophone, this one is a model S3:

   

My chassis appears to be the "improved" schematic version on the bottom.

I replaced all of the caps, save for the two .02 mfd's (I wanted to replace the "tar boxes" and then see if I could coax some sound out of it). I also read a thread on ARF where Norm suggested changing c14 and c16 to 10 mfd electrolytics and eliminate c15 to improve sound and reduce hum, so that's what I did.

So, after trying several tubes, I'm still getting no sound. My voltages are quite erratic as well (See the chart below...I used the mouse to "color" in red the values I'm getting...hence the hen scratching that looks like a 4 year old wrote it Icon_smile )

   

Trying to inject a signal, I get noise that's controllable with the volume control across both the long and short antenna terminals. On the grid of the output tube I get noise, but no noise on the plate of the output tube. On the plate of the detector tube I get noise, but no noise on the grid of the detector tube. The resistors are a bit high (save for the 2 meg which is reading 5 meg) but none are open.

The choke measures about 400 ohms, so that's not open. Speaker field and output transformer are good.

Anyone (paging Terry) have any thoughts on where to zero in on first? It seems to be a relatively simple 5 tube radio but very ancient in design (it has a multi tap, open air transformer that looks pretty scary in itself but it still putting out voltage and not drawing any amps).

Greg V.
West Bend, WI
Member WARCI.org
#2

Did you connect the - side of c-14 to the chassis?
Does it ave the original spkr that has a tap in the field coil winding?

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

>>Did you connect the - side of c-14 to the chassis?

No, the neg side is going to the choke and transformer.

>>Does it ave the original spkr that has a tap in the field coil winding?

It's a Jensen speaker that looks to be a replacement, but it DOES have the tap in the field coil. That checks out good.

Greg V.
West Bend, WI
Member WARCI.org
#4

How much - voltage do you have from the ct of the hv winding to the chassis? Need abt -50v. With -1.7v on the grid of the 45 the plate current is going to be pretty high. Disconnect one end of the C-5 and see with the - voltage increases. If C-5 is leaky that will apply + voltage to the grid of the 45, not good.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#5

I jumped the gun a bit and should've just went ahead and replace the two .02 caps and the resistor bank. That revealed an open 1 meg resistor, a bad solder joint at the non-grounded .02, and some bad solder joints around the speaker plug. Happy to report she is singing tonight and actually sounding pretty good for an 89 year old radio. Voltages are there where they should be now. What a strange power transformer, though. Just by moving the fuse between terminals 84 to 85 or 85 to 86 you can go from 110 volts to 125!

Greg V.
West Bend, WI
Member WARCI.org
#6

The 2nd .02 (goes from from the output trans to gnd) could be reduced in value to brighten up the sound a bit, to .01 or .005 mfd.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
It works! I received the PCBs this morning in the mail, and put everything together. I reused the base from the original...jrblasde — 04:32 PM
PT-6 antenna connections
I seem to have lost my way on this PT-6. I see the antenna aerial transformer schematic - I’m reading pins 1 through ...bridkarl — 12:30 PM
40-150 General questions
Good thing you're a good electrician ... the pictures show a lot of rewiring in your future! Take care and BE HEALTHY!...GarySP — 11:52 AM
40-150 General questions
I think RobB has it right. It is a part number and looks like its stamped on the chassis and that wasn't something you ...klondike98 — 11:41 AM
40-150 General questions
It's most likely a part number. Most of Philco part numbers are in that format. I looked at the parts list for this mode...RodB — 08:10 AM
40-150 General questions
Hi Kevin, No, I don't but I like your Quote about being a good electrician. The way I look at it is "The fact ...MrFixr55 — 08:06 AM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
7K should be fine. While not a perfect match (This transformer is meant for 6V6 tubes), Antique Electronic Supply (AES)...MrFixr55 — 08:03 AM
40-150 General questions
I discovered a stamp on the underside of the breadboard on my Philco 40-150. It is"56-1417' in black ink with numbe...Kevin_D — 07:14 AM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
FYI the Impedance of the HR20 (the one I have) secondary of the audio transformer is 5 ohms. The 38-7XX speaker is suppo...tludka — 04:22 PM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
Yeah, don't use the transformer currently on the H-20 (Dopf, I thought "H20, is that new technology, a speaker usin...MrFixr55 — 03:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2780 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2778 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>