Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Found: 38-690 Volume Control
#1

When received, my 38-690 had a replacement dual pot volume control. The issue I have is that the volume cranks up loud really fast with the control just cracked. I suspect the pot was replaced with a linear taper instead of audio taper.

Can you confirm how sensitive the volume control should be when starting from all the way down?
If what I suspect is really the case, I’ll look for a replacement through an add or Mark Opatt.

Thank you.

Tony

“People may not remember how fast you did a job, but they will remember how well you did it”
#2

What you can do is set the control @ the center of it's rotation and measure the resistance from the wiper to each end. If it's about the same it's a linear taper.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

I measured both pots and they are roughly equal to wiper on each side when centered. I guess that answered my question. Before I start looking for one, would both pots be audio taper? My gut says yes.

Tony

“People may not remember how fast you did a job, but they will remember how well you did it”
#4

According to the service info the original part is 33-5240.

There's a previous discussion of that part here:
https://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=13625

Quote:Part #75 is 500K and part #76 is 100K, for the dual pot.

No mention of the taper type but I'd bet on audio taper too (it is a volume control after all).
#5

Thank you guys for your help. I’ll start searching. The radio works, just has a volume control that’s too sensitive.

Tony

“People may not remember how fast you did a job, but they will remember how well you did it”
#6

Mark Oppat is making one up for me.

Tony

“People may not remember how fast you did a job, but they will remember how well you did it”




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I've only run into a speaker with an open filed coil twice, and they were on newer speakers from the 1940s. One ...Arran — 12:48 AM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yes, this is my plan for now and what do I got to lose, this is not even the speaker from this radio, but one o...morzh — 10:44 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike;  I would unwrap the field coil, and see if maybe there a break near one of the ends, like where the coil wire att...Arran — 10:23 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
...and this is what I did. I fed a little LT into the screwholes with a small brush, and a little on the rim next to the...morzh — 09:52 PM
Philco 40-120C Restoration
I combined the two 40-120C threads together as we like to keep the discussion of the same radio together. It helps with...klondike98 — 09:36 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
Just checked were I buy tubes price is four dollars. So living in Florid we have a local source for tubes. David    David — 09:14 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
The higher voltage may be due to higher mains voltage. My mains run 120-125AC when the set was new mains would be 110-11...David — 09:09 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
Thank you for your reply. I pulled a speaker from a Philco 41-221 and received the same result. I used a signal tracer t...bluecap — 08:45 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
Have you tried a different speaker? How did you trace the distortion? How do you know it is weak? What is the reference?...morzh — 08:33 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Amen to that! Every time I think I’ve captured them all, I realize that there’s another error. My goal is to finish with...jrblasde — 07:00 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>