Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Scott SLRM
#31

That's a fine looking receiver Mike Icon_thumbup

Sorry the electrolytic cans didn't work out exactly as you planned, but the three you used look fine.

John KK4ZLF
Lexington, KY
"illegitimis non carborundum"
#32

Just a quick update tonight. I sprayed all the switch contacts and worked them back and forth a lot last night, then let them sit and dry. Tonight the radio really came alive and is working very well. So far I have just used my 10 feet of wire strung up around my work bench as a test antenna. As you read above, I replaced the special old style U.S. Navy antenna connector with a modern SO-239. I am just using it as a connector, NOT with coax and a balanced feed line. So far I am just using the center post of the PL-259 to connect the antenna. I will make a small label explaining the situation and affix it to the back of the chassis beside the plug after I put the radio back in its steel cabinet. With just that antenna I was able to pick up stations all over the standard broadcast AM dial, WSM in Nashville comes in very clear, as do stations WRVA Richmond, VA, and WLW from Cincinnati, OH, just to name a few of MANY. The reception rivals any of the "communications receivers" I have recently refurbished. I did not do any alignment at all, just replaced the input "death caps" and the filter electrolytics, and changed the antenna connector. On the next band up I was able to get CHU Canada at 3.33 MC clearly as well as the top of the AM broadcast band below that, and some shortwave stations above it. Between there are Ham bands and I get a lot of RF hash from the high tension lines at those frequencies. On the next band I was able to get WWV at 5 MC, which I almost NEVER pick up with that wimpy indoor antenna, but it came in very intelligibly with moderate fading. On the highest band I was able to receive WWV at 10 MC as well as several shortwave stations. I can't imagine what it will do hooked to my outdoor antenna! From what I have seen so far, this receiver rivals or excels the National NC-125, and the Lafayette HE-30, which is a pretty tall order. I haven't tried out the CWO on the ham bands yet. I'll wait until I connect it to a better antenna, but that should be pretty interesting too. If it is at all like the National or lafayette it will take some playing with to master that.




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 16B Parts
I think the chassis is painted.morzh — 08:13 PM
Philco 38-2 Automatic Tuning
Honestrly, the original is quite acceptable and, it seems to me, can be cleaned.morzh — 08:11 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Mondial left a thread about remanufacturing thois type coupler.morzh — 08:09 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Are you talking about rewinding or rewiring? For rewiring, meaning runnin wires to the coil from other components, the ...morzh — 08:08 PM
12' Philco
I wonder who would be able to "no stoop" with this one.morzh — 08:05 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Hello PHORUM members, I am still working on restoration of my PHILCO 37-640.  I want to start with rewiring the IF ca...georgetownjohn — 06:32 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
I am working on a Philco 41-608 with the gear-driven changer.  The coupling (#35-2220) between the motor assembly and th...alangard — 06:29 PM
Gilfillan Brothers Car Radio?
There is a Mission Bell model 19/19A that could be what you’re looking for, Riders vol 4. It has the tube line-up of: 0Z...Joe Rossi — 05:01 PM
Looking for verification of correct schematic.
Definitely 870044RossH — 01:12 PM
12' Philco
Wonder if the chassis was big too.daveone23 — 12:38 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2358 online users. [Complete List]
» 4 Member(s) | 2354 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar

>