Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Modified 38-12 to what purpose?
#1

I'm working on a 38-12 that has two modifications, one of which I don't understand.

Visit      http://www.nostalgiaair.org/Resources/236/M0013236.htm    for the schematics.

The modification I'm seeing is coming off the center terminal of the volume control. It consists of a 50pF mica in parallel with a 400kohm resistor which then connects to the .01 mfd cap that is shown on the schematic. After changing the filter caps and removing the modification in power supply, I turned the radio on. It works about as well as you would expect for leaky caps and many way out of tolerance resistors. I tuned in a station and listened to it then bypassed the modification. As far as I could tell, there was no difference between the two.

Does anyone have an idea as to what this modification as supposed to do?

Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it.
#2

Looks like someone was unhappy with the audio high frequency response of the radio and tried to modify the circuit. As you describe it, the mod would act to boost the highs a bit by placing a 50 pF in series with the volume control output. The parallel 400k resistor bypasses the 50 pF cap so the cap has only a limited effect. Actually, the circuit cuts all the lower frequencies so the net effect is an apparent increase in the highs.

As you noticed, the mod has very little effect as it only would relatively increase the highs by only 1 dB or so. Hardly worth the effort.
#3

Thanks for the reply. I knew there had to be a reason even though the modification wasn't very effective.

Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it.




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
I knew that Fluke was the Cadillac so with that in mind what Fluke would you recommend I get?dconant — 03:53 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Yep. 10W is probably enough. Also, if the meter measures Farads, then it should also have that "Delta" button...morzh — 02:38 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
I measured the current through the resistor I am using as a replacement for the speaker field coil and got 40ma. So that...dconant — 02:32 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
No I'm not saying I don't own a DMM. I have a CCC one (Thsinde 18+). I forgot that could read caps. I did purchase a Flu...dconant — 02:28 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Are you telling me you do not own any decent DMM, that can measure capacitances from a few pF and up? Even todays CCC (C...morzh — 01:44 PM
Restoring Philco 96
Well, selectivity today, with stations disappearing, is not such a problem for TRF as it likely used to be. Although wh...morzh — 01:42 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Mike I did that already and can't really get any kind of reading. My little Honeytek A6013L reads 0 on all scales. One s...dconant — 01:38 PM
New member
Well, to be frank, when it comes to radios, especially the older types, a person with no electronic background could be ...morzh — 01:33 PM
Restoring Philco 96
Thanks for mentioning the video you had uploaded. Somehow I missed that post. Just watched your video, and it sounds to ...jrblasde — 01:28 PM
Restoring Philco 96
Joseph well, for now we will have to get by the video I have made, as the final video would not be made before I get a ...morzh — 01:04 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3750 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 3748 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>