Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Variation with the 37-650
#1

This question is primarily for Ron, but if anyone else has info as well, feel free to chime in.

I noted in the Philco Gallery a different variation on the 37-650 console. On that one, there are a couple of horizontal inlays on both side of the dial, and on mine, which is pictured in a previous thread on the Phorum:

http://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=2

...it has 2 thin vertical inlays about 4 inces either side of the dial. This is the version of the 37-650 I've seen elsewhere besides the one I have. Otherwise, the two appear to be identical in every other aspect.

I'm just wondering if there is documentation regarding the two versions of this console, and how common it was to have this or other variations on other Philco models.

Thanks in advance for anything you can provide.

Bill

Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
#2

Hi Bill,

Just an observation, but your radio appears to match with the 37-2650X in the gallery Icon_confused:

http://www.philcoradio.com/gallery/1937a.htm#bh

Paul
#3

You're right, Paul. That's pretty interesting. The variation could be indicated in the similar model numbers such as 37-650 and 37-2650.

Looking at the production figures, it does indicate totals include both models, so I guess that makes sense.

Paging Mr. Philco! Icon_biggrin Your thoughts?

Bill

Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
#4

Let me look into this and get back to you. Bill, as you know, I've been "out of the loop" for awhile, so do you have a picture of your 37-650 posted here or elsewhere?

EDIT: I just noticed the link in your post above, Bill. DOH!!! Icon_confused Your 37-650 is a very nice set.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

OOPS!!! I don't often make mistakes Icon_lol but I see I have an incorrect photo in the Gallery. What is labeled a 37-650X is actually a 37-630X. I'll make the corrections later today.

Oh, and Bill, if you'd like to allow use of your 37-650X in the Gallery, I'd be honored...thanks.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#6

Actually, the honor would be all mine. Icon_biggrin

Do you need a photo that is reformatted, or is the one posted adequate? Let me know what you need.

Nonetheless, this was an interesting topic. I looked at the cabinet label and couldn't find anything that indicated "37-2650" anywhere, but the "37-650" was big and bold.

Goes to show we all learn something new all the time in the world of old radios. Icon_wink

Bill

Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
#7

O.K., folks, Bill's 37-650X photo is now in the Philco Radio Gallery for the first half of the 1937 season (June 1936).

http://www.philcoradio.com/gallery/1937a.htm#at

Many thanks to Bill for allowing use of his photo. And my sincere apologies for the initial error in pictures. Dealing with the sheer number of Philco models produced, the occasional error is bound to creep in. Icon_redface But at least in HTML format, changes/corrections can be easily made.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#8

Ron,

Always happy to help out any way I can.

Now, I'm assuming the other picture was of a 37-630, which was a terrific shot. Are you going to use that one in place of the catalog picture?

Bill

Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
#9

Yup, I'll make that correction also...

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
It works! I received the PCBs this morning in the mail, and put everything together. I reused the base from the original...jrblasde — 04:32 PM
PT-6 antenna connections
I seem to have lost my way on this PT-6. I see the antenna aerial transformer schematic - I’m reading pins 1 through ...bridkarl — 12:30 PM
40-150 General questions
Good thing you're a good electrician ... the pictures show a lot of rewiring in your future! Take care and BE HEALTHY!...GarySP — 11:52 AM
40-150 General questions
I think RobB has it right. It is a part number and looks like its stamped on the chassis and that wasn't something you ...klondike98 — 11:41 AM
40-150 General questions
It's most likely a part number. Most of Philco part numbers are in that format. I looked at the parts list for this mode...RodB — 08:10 AM
40-150 General questions
Hi Kevin, No, I don't but I like your Quote about being a good electrician. The way I look at it is "The fact ...MrFixr55 — 08:06 AM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
7K should be fine. While not a perfect match (This transformer is meant for 6V6 tubes), Antique Electronic Supply (AES)...MrFixr55 — 08:03 AM
40-150 General questions
I discovered a stamp on the underside of the breadboard on my Philco 40-150. It is"56-1417' in black ink with numbe...Kevin_D — 07:14 AM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
FYI the Impedance of the HR20 (the one I have) secondary of the audio transformer is 5 ohms. The 38-7XX speaker is suppo...tludka — 04:22 PM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
Yeah, don't use the transformer currently on the H-20 (Dopf, I thought "H20, is that new technology, a speaker usin...MrFixr55 — 03:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2493 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 2492 Guest(s)
Avatar

>