Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Test equipment repair
#1

I am wondering if anyone can help me. I have a signal generator that needs some repair. I was troubleshooting a radio and I think I touched the wrong terminal…OOOPS. The power light is on but it no longer puts out a signal.
It is a B&K Solid State model 2000D. Would you know of anyone in the area who can repair it? I live in Lake in the Hills. NW of Chicago near Crystal Lake. So far the links on my club's web site haven't helped.
I would be happy to drop it off at their location or ship it..
Thanks,
Eric

Eric
The Villages, FL
Member: Philco Phorum, ARF, ARCI & Radiomuseum.org

#2

Hello Eric: when you use a sig gen to troubleshoot or align it is always a good idea to have a small, vic .01 mFd on the end of your hot probe to isolate it from any DC present.

Try Roger Kennedy at alltubetesters.com and see if he can help.
#3

Thanks TA,

I was using a.1mfd. Not a good move, huh?
I'll try Roger.

Eric

Eric
The Villages, FL
Member: Philco Phorum, ARF, ARCI & Radiomuseum.org

#4

Eric

Capacitance itself almost does not matter, not for killing the generator.
What matters is the working voltage. If you used a small WV cap and it was destroyed, then it could've taken out something behind it.

Your gen probably has a potentiometer - attenuator, whose wiper then somehow is connected to the output. The pot could've died if the cap shorted.

Start with 1) turning the gen off and DISCONNECTING it from the mains, 2) take an ohmmmeter and see (if you have the sch) if your pot is OK or not. 3) The pot in its turn may be connected through another cap to a, say, cathode follower. See all elements there - the load resistor, that may go from the cathode to GND, the cap. I somehow think the extent of the damage is not likely to go beyond the output buffer stage.

Mike
#5

Agree with Mike. If you were using a .1mFd isolation it should have protected the sig gen, unless the V rating of the cap was too low.
#6

Well, the cap is a .1mfd @600volts so I guess it wasn't my fault. I needed to know that because I want to make sure that when it is repaired I can still use a .1mfd cap.

I think I have someone to repair it.

Thanks,
Eric

Eric
The Villages, FL
Member: Philco Phorum, ARF, ARCI & Radiomuseum.org

#7

Thinking of it, what could've potentially happen was that a larger than necessary capacitance, when connected to a high voltage, created inrush current through that pot that exceeded what was acceptable. This would not happen if it was connected to a, say, a grid voltage via bias resistors that are high in value, but if you accidentally connected it to a B+ plate supply that would be able to do it. This is where a lower capacitance might've saved the schematic due to a lower inrush.

Anyways, if you point us to a sch of your gen, we'd be able to try to point you in the right direction.

As for the value of that cap, in the future try to use the smallest possible value that still give you acceptable impedance at the lowest RF frequency: this way you both can provide an adequate input for your RF amps and avoid a destructive inrush no matter where you decided to touch your receiver.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
Joseph, now you are an engineer!!RodB — 06:37 PM
PT-6 antenna connections
Hi, reading your explanation I can see the confusion. If you take it one connection at a time it should result in a desi...RodB — 06:34 PM
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
It works! I received the PCBs this morning in the mail, and put everything together. I reused the base from the original...jrblasde — 04:32 PM
PT-6 antenna connections
I seem to have lost my way on this PT-6. I see the antenna aerial transformer schematic - I’m reading pins 1 through ...bridkarl — 12:30 PM
40-150 General questions
Good thing you're a good electrician ... the pictures show a lot of rewiring in your future! Take care and BE HEALTHY!...GarySP — 11:52 AM
40-150 General questions
I think RobB has it right. It is a part number and looks like its stamped on the chassis and that wasn't something you ...klondike98 — 11:41 AM
40-150 General questions
It's most likely a part number. Most of Philco part numbers are in that format. I looked at the parts list for this mode...RodB — 08:10 AM
40-150 General questions
Hi Kevin, No, I don't but I like your Quote about being a good electrician. The way I look at it is "The fact ...MrFixr55 — 08:06 AM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
7K should be fine. While not a perfect match (This transformer is meant for 6V6 tubes), Antique Electronic Supply (AES)...MrFixr55 — 08:03 AM
40-150 General questions
I discovered a stamp on the underside of the breadboard on my Philco 40-150. It is"56-1417' in black ink with numbe...Kevin_D — 07:14 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2717 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 2716 Guest(s)
Avatar

>