Posts: 76
Threads: 20
Joined: Oct 2010
City: Oskaloosa
State, Province, Country: KANSAS
I am starting on my 116PX. I noticed a large cap 3.0uf; can I use a 2.2uf for that of should I get a 3.0? Could I use a 3.0 e-cap? I have attached the link to the schematic but the cap in question does not have a part number, it is next to the 30K resistor part#97 on the drawing.
http://www.philcoradio.com/tech/images/116px.jpg
Thanks
Skip
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2008
City: Sedona, AZ/Placentia/CA
Skip, I would think a 5mfd would work just dandy there and they are a common value.
Jerry
A friend in need is a pest! Bill Slee ca 1970.
Posts: 4,682
Threads: 51
Joined: Sep 2008
City: Sandwick, BC, CA
I would use a non polarized capacitor, or a pair of, since the value is small. I think you could pair a 1 uf with that 2.2 uf in parallel to make it a 3.2 uf.
Regards
Arran
Posts: 76
Threads: 20
Joined: Oct 2010
City: Oskaloosa
State, Province, Country: KANSAS
Thanks guys. I figured the value was not too critical, just wanted to confirm.
Posts: 15,691
Threads: 551
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ
WHen I needed 3uF I pared 3.2uF and 1uF in parallel.
However I have just bought some I think 3.3uF which I intend to use in place of 3uF in the 37-116, which has both 2uF and 3uF values in it.
Posts: 2,353
Threads: 92
Joined: May 2010
City: Clayton, NC
3.2 and 1 in parallel will yield 4.2 mFd.
Caps in parallel are additive in nature.
Posts: 15,691
Threads: 551
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ
Sorry, meant 2.2uF. (I kinda guessed they add when in parallel)
3.2uF value is not even standard; 3.3uF is.
(This post was last modified: 06-09-2013, 04:06 PM by morzh.)
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2008
City: Sedona, AZ/Placentia/CA
I love this stuff. Why worry so much about getting an e-cap to the precise old value?
Going all the way to parallel caps? That is ugly! Just toss in a 5mfd and relax. It will work nice. Higher seldom will hurt where this is located.
Jerry
A friend in need is a pest! Bill Slee ca 1970.
Posts: 15,691
Threads: 551
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ
Actually most of the places where those smaler values electrolyte caps are are not sensitive to higher value at all, the lower value being probably a budgetary consideration rather than electrical.
And the filtrer caps.....the one that probably should be observed is the very first one across the rectifier. The voltage will go up as you increase the value, and copupled with today's higher line voltage in the first place it will add that unnecessary extra we can do without. The one after the choke is less critical as it mostly affects the voltage when there is no load.
Posts: 1,107
Threads: 88
Joined: Jun 2011
City: Tacoma
State, Province, Country: Washington
That, and 'lytics are far from precise as far as tolerance is concerned. IIRC, the basic tolerances for 'lytics are something like -20/+100..
Posts: 2,353
Threads: 92
Joined: May 2010
City: Clayton, NC
Yes, that's true!
Just for grins, try testing your new caps on your cap checkers.
Posts: 15,691
Threads: 551
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ
Well, the tolerance of the Panasonic caps I use is +/- 20% at 120Hz at room temp and I did test them and it is right on the money. Cheaper kind general purpose can be that +20/-80%. Though when you test them new at room temp they are rarely grossly outside 10%.
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
Jackson 715 not working
|
Mrfixr55, its working now. I cleaned the switches and sockets with spray cleaner. Thanks for helping on this one.daveone23 — 06:26 PM |
Jackson 715 not working
|
Now that you posted the schematic, I don't know why that Sprague electrolytic cap is across the meter, as it is not indi...MrFixr55 — 05:51 PM |
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
|
What may be lacking in the PP Tube amps may be the 2nd harmonics, which some, especially RCA back in the day called &quo...MrFixr55 — 05:32 PM |
Jackson 715 not working
|
Usually in an emission tester, the tube under test is measured as if it were a diode. So, some testers connect all the g...RodB — 04:17 PM |
Restoring Philco 37-604C
|
Yep. F5 is green, D5 is Red.
Red is Bad.
Green is Clean.morzh — 01:30 PM |
Jackson 715 not working
|
I did start to do that but I stalled out because I could not figure out how the grid and plate get voltage. In this diag...daveone23 — 11:52 AM |
Restoring Philco 37-604C
|
(Insert Homer Simpson "DOPF" Here.)
When all fails, look at the can. Took the Ron Ramirez advice, red Caig D...MrFixr55 — 09:23 AM |
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
|
From your text I am not sure if you intend to use the existing speaker with a resistor instead of the field coil.
It wo...morzh — 08:44 AM |
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
|
My field coil is bad. I am still hoping to find an original, but if I can't I will go with a fitting Philco speaker, 125...dconant — 08:34 AM |
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
|
As Rod said, it is OK to use a fitting speaker, and then look for an original one.
If you buy a Hammond 125 output tr...morzh — 08:15 AM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently no members online. |
|
|