Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

37-116 or 38-116, which is a better performer?
#1

Since we are on the subject of mirf's 38-116, which one tends to be the better performer? Does anyong out there have both to compare? Are they the same chassis with the exception of the output tubes?
#2

They are close.
Triodes are considered very good in pushpull and 37 has them. I would not expect any appreciable difference in overall performance. I think when comparing these without specialised equipment it will be matter of personal taste/preference/affection etc.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

There is a difference in the RF section of the 37-116 and the late model 38-116 code 125 chassis. 

The 37-116 and the early 38-116 use a simple padding arrangement for the short wave bands which tends to compress the dial scale at the high end of the bands and expand it at the low end. The later 38-116 code 125 (and the 38-690) use a different RF section with split stator tuning cap gangs which provide a more linear calibration of the dial. Many of the alignment trimmers were also eliminated with this arrangement. You can tell the revised front end by looking at the RF amp tube. It uses a round aluminum tube shield and a 6U7G instead of the 6K7G with the usual square shield.

Philco must have thought it was an improvement since they used the identical revised tuning system on the high end 38-690. 
#4

I agree with these replies.
I have both and re-capped them both.
Very similar for sure. I found the 37 was a little easier than the 38.
murf
#5

(04-14-2016, 12:05 AM)Mondial Wrote:  There is a difference in the RF section of the 37-116 and the late model 38-116 code 125 chassis. 

The 37-116 and the early 38-116 use a simple padding arrangement for the short wave bands which tends to compress the dial scale at the high end of the bands and expand it at the low end. The later 38-116 code 125 (and the 38-690) use a different RF section with split stator tuning cap gangs which provide a more linear calibration of the dial. Many of the alignment trimmers were also eliminated with this arrangement. You can tell the revised front end by looking at the RF amp tube. It uses a round aluminum tube shield and a 6U7G instead of the 6K7G with the usual square shield.

Philco must have thought it was an improvement since they used the identical revised tuning system on the high end 38-690. 

 Anything that results in a more linear tracking or stations on short wave sounds like an improvement to me.
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Ok MrFixr55,  I have tried the DeoxIT D5 on the band switch and even though it has relieved the tension I felt when turn...osanders0311 — 11:11 AM
Part numbers to model cross
Is there a reference somewhere where you can punch in Philco part numbers and see what models those parts were used in?Jim Dutridge — 10:17 AM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Hi OSanders, Look carefully at the band switch. Turn it slowly and "wiggle" it around the desired band. ...MrFixr55 — 12:33 AM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
I think that RCA and GE introduced metal tubes in the USA in 1936.  I don't know if they were being made by RCA, GE or b...MrFixr55 — 11:20 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Vlad95, Thank you for the stringing guides and wow there are so manyosanders0311 — 06:01 PM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
A pre war Hallicrafters, and an early one too, very nice! 1936 is pretty early for metal tubes too, which would explain ...Arran — 05:58 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Thanks Rod, "When you hear the background hiss and no station it usually indicates that the oscillator quit" ...osanders0311 — 05:52 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
RodB :beerchug:Vlad95 — 10:22 AM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Vlad, you nailed it. Swiss and German roots.RodB — 09:54 AM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
Well this is a Hallicrafters SX/9 circa 1936. No real issues so far although I dodged a real bullet with a cap that was...bridkarl — 07:59 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1274 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 1272 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>