Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tearing Apart
#1

Well, I'm now tearing apart my parts chassis- I think it is from a 38-3, but stamped inside is 38-1754. Details match a 38-3: 9 tube, 3 band, magnetic tuning. I'm just wondering about the 1754 stamp... Any ideas? Or is it just a miscellaneous stamping? I know my 37-650 had 37-650 clearly stamped on it in several places...

Mainly tearing this one up because it came as a parts set to me, but space requirements demand I take it to parts. No cabinet or speaker- I just was given the chassis, with a couple tubes on it. Luckily one was an excellent 6F6G I needed for the 37-650. Also, I believe it has the same power supply- although the numbers are different.

Lots of bits, however... Now I happily have more bakelites to rebuild for stock, some more junctions, rf coils, variable caps, tube sockets... Just have to figure out what to do with the magnetic tuning parts. Keep them or flog 'em? I'm having fun Icon_smile

Scott

Old Cars, Old Radios, Old Pipes and Young Women... What more is there?
#2

I'll bet that stamp in on the RF sub-chassis, right? Icon_smile

That's the part number of the sub-chassis assy, not anything to do with a "model number."
Philco sub-bases and sub-chassis' were designated with the 38- prefix.

See this Service Tip from my site about Philco's part numbering scheme:

PHILCO SERVICE HINTS & TIPS - NUMBER 34
Philco Part Numbering System


Many people confuse Philco part numbers that start with 36-, 37-, 38-, 39-, etc. with model numbers, due to the fact that Philco started using the model year as a prefix to it's model numbers in 1937 on up. There's a Service Tip on this in the TIPS section as well.
#3

You hit it, Chuck! When the light hit the back of the chassis main frame just right, I could make out the original 38-3, code ??? stamp, where it was missing... I could see where the ink had been, but it was no longer dark. Odd thing- my 37-650 had that number(37-650) stamped in the same type large number in several places, similar to the number I was originally referring to. (These are rubber stampings- not metal stamps)

Scott

Old Cars, Old Radios, Old Pipes and Young Women... What more is there?




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
New Philco Repair Bench
I am sure this is the archive, and not the Chuck's site.morzh — 09:50 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
It's not like we are good friends with that wire and can tell it from other ptetty identical looking wires. Why'n't you...morzh — 09:49 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I'm not sure why that wire wasn't covered in the video. I'm pretty sure the 6A8 won't work until that pin is grounded. Y...RodB — 09:47 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
You'll have to forgive me, I am not sure what you mean.  Can you explain what you are really saying.  If anyone does not...georgetownjohn — 08:05 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Those are details better left to the ones who know. Maybe you disconnected the wrong end of the wire.RodB — 06:22 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Maybe this is starting to make some sense in my hard head.  Is this why the wire in question was not in the great Ron Ra...georgetownjohn — 04:34 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I was correct with the 6A8 pin connection's, 7 and 8 are connected to ground as well as the tube shield (the broken line...RodB — 02:41 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
What does the dotted line representing that surrounds the tube in the schematic?georgetownjohn — 02:17 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Hello John, I have been there either label got lost or was not labeled ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:15 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Sorry, it is a Philco 37-640.  Does that help?--Johngeorgetownjohn — 02:14 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>