Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Modern signal generators
#1

As most of you know, I invested in a Siglent SDG1032X function generator a few years ago after using an old Clough-Brengle for decades, then a B+K 4040 like John B's for a while.

Pros of the Siglent: Direct digital readout, no drifting.
Con of the Siglent: Output level too high for typical vintage radios, must be reduced to a usable level with the use of inline BNC attenuators. I am using three such attenuators, a 20 dB, another 20 dB, and a 14 dB to reduce the output signal by 54 dB. This has solved my "signal too strong" issue.

While I liked my B+K 4040, I did not like the fact that it, too, drifted in frequency while in use. Of course, the old 1930s Clough-Brengle drifted badly.

With the setup I have now, I am able to give my radios the best alignments possible. I recently had my RCA C15-3 console chassis out for a tuneup. The IF alignment was good already, but I was able to improve the RF alignment a good deal.

I'll ask this question - do the HP generators produce a low level signal usable in vintage receivers without overloading them?

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#2

The sole problem with mine is, it is about 50 lbs or so, and moving it to the table and back poses the risk of back problems.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

Ron,

The HP generators I had to leave behind would easily go below the thresholds of any radio I worked on (-134dB?)
#4

morzh Wrote:The sole problem with mine is, it is about 50 lbs or so

50 lbs? That's a lightweight. My General Radio Type 805-C Standard Signal Generator weighs 117-1/2 lbs. I like to joke that if a tornado takes my house the workbench will still be there because of the 805-C holding it down.

Dale H. Cook, GR/HP/Tek Collector, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
https://plymouthcolony.net/starcity/radios/
#5

Ron Ramirez Wrote:I am using three such attenuators, a 20 dB, another 20 dB, and a 14 dB to reduce the output signal by 54 dB.

Ron - The HP 355C (0-12dB in 1 dB steps) and 355D (0 to 120dB in 10dB steps) step attenuators are more elegant solutions. I have long owned both, largely for use with GR unit oscillators which lack step attenuators.


Ron Ramirez Wrote:... do the HP generators produce a low level signal usable in vintage receivers without overloading them?

They do - around less than 0.1 microvolt into 50 ohms is not unusual.

Dale H. Cook, GR/HP/Tek Collector, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
https://plymouthcolony.net/starcity/radios/




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 38-2 Automatic Tuning
I received my new 38-2 dial. I'm a little disappointed. As you can see in the picture the blues have a white shadow. The...dconant — 11:13 AM
Philco 38-2 Low Volume
I have been playing my 38-2 for a while now and it is doing very well. I did have to replace the 6A8 (osc) as it develop...dconant — 11:03 AM
Philco Speaker Spider
Hello, Does anyone with a 3 D printer make the spiders for those old Philco speakers? That might be a good idea for some...dconant — 09:41 AM
Philco 16B Parts
Hello, I'm looking to buy a 16B but I'm not so sure of what I am looking at. First as seen from the picture it looks lik...dconant — 09:17 AM
Looking for verification of correct schematic.
Klondike98, Thank you. I'll double check that SN and get back to you. GarySP, Thank you for the schematic.RossH — 12:13 AM
Looking for verification of correct schematic.
I think you have the correct take on your set. Ron's annotated early schematics that note the below B22000 serial numbe...klondike98 — 12:04 AM
Looking for verification of correct schematic.
Hello Ross. The Philco Radio Library located at the bottom of the page has the schematic with the tube count you have. ...GarySP — 10:48 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Tim It's be interesting if you put your schematic here. Who knows, you could get some advice from a few folks here. ...morzh — 10:01 PM
Philco 42-390, code 121 speaker
Thanks for that information. It would appear from the output transformer parts list that the transformer that was origi...Stevelog — 07:21 PM
Looking for verification of correct schematic.
I would like to verify that my thoughts are correct regarding my Model 70 and its appropriate schematic. My chassis inf...RossH — 06:26 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1052 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1051 Guest(s)
Avatar

>