Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

BC-348 Power Supply
#1

I've acquired a BC-348 receiver and need to make a power supply. There are several designs out there, with the Hallicrafters conversion being the most widely known. But my research has turned up that Philco also had designed or made a BC-348 power supply for 117 V house current. Does anybody know anythng aout it of have the plans? Thank you.
#2

IMHO Any supply made to fit in quantity would have been via gov. contract, in doing so, they would all be alike.

Pliny the younger
“nihil novum nihil varium nihil quod non semel spectasse sufficiat”
#3

No, none of these were gov't issue. This was after the war, when they were being bought by hams and Hallicrafters offered an AC power supply to replace the original dynamotor. But I have read that Philco also offered one, but cannot find any info about them. It would not necessarily be the same design. There was no government issue or mandate on these radios, now in private ownership.
#4

I've had one or two (BC-348's) over the yrs but it's been a long time ago. Here's a good starting point https://www.radioblvd.com/bc-348_dynamotor_part3.htm I don't remember if you have to rewire the heater circuit to make it usable at 6.3v vs it's normal 24vdc. That's a common thing with WWII aircraft set like the command set SCR-274N/ARC-5 that were dynamotor powered.

If you can find a pt that can make 250vdc at 60 or 70ma + a 24v transformer to power the heaters that's a good start. The rest is just some caps, diodes, and resistors. If you have some room a choke is always a good think to filter the hum out.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#5

Quote:No, none of these were gov't issue. This was after the war, when they were being bought by hams and Hallicrafters offered an AC power supply to replace the original dynamotor. But I have read that Philco also offered one, but cannot find any info about them. It would not necessarily be the same design. There was no government issue or mandate on these radios, now in private ownership.
At a local estate sale (1985) of former Air Force pilot I bought a 348, it is equipped with a gov power supply drop-in for dynamotor. Some 348's never flew and were used on ground in a military environment thus the gov supply.

Pliny the younger
“nihil novum nihil varium nihil quod non semel spectasse sufficiat”
#6

Well if the government issued them I'd like to see that design too.
#7

Here's what was done right after the war. You may find some of these circuits added to your set. In those days 120 to 24v transformers were rare now a dime a doz. I would bother to rewire the heaters just use a 24v trans.

https://www.w7ekb.com/glowbugs/Military/...l_vol1.pdf

See pg 29

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
The list of my radio & TV collection!
Peter; I found an old thread on the ARF, I was wrong about when Rogers took over DeForest Crosley, it looks like it w...Arran — 06:15 AM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
Thank you Arran, this is very interesting information. With your permission, I will definitely use it when I make a vide...RadioSvit — 04:14 AM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
Peter; For a start your DeForest Crosley 6D632 was a 1936-37 model, and I believe it had six tubes, and 3 wave bands,...Arran — 03:07 AM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
This is interesting, they actually designed the B+ side with some form of voltage regulation, I think? Most of the B+ su...Arran — 02:21 AM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
They are trying to use a regulator. Essentially it is an LDO schematic. LDOs are supposed to greatly reduce ripple, so t...morzh — 12:11 AM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
So, I just built a 90 volt 40ma battery eliminator for a farm radio and had to use 1000 mfd for the input filter cap to ...RodB — 10:31 PM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
Caps of 1,000 uF 250V are about $7 in Mouser. C1 could be increased. A NTC inrush limiter could be employed to limit t...morzh — 10:24 PM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
Bruce B — 09:41 PM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
Bruce Could you post the schematic if this power supply?morzh — 09:31 PM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
Hello All, I have built a battery eliminator using the most popular AES K101a. Using plans and all the AES parts  order...Bruce B — 09:27 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2173 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 2172 Guest(s)
Avatar

>