Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

First attempt at rewinding an oscillator coil (Phil 38-12)
#16

Art Hoch Wrote:2nd try today:

I reversed the connections to adjust for a different winding direction....same result.

Art, when you say you reversed the connections, did you reverse the connections on both windings? If so, that would not change the relationship between the windings. You would want to reverse the connection on only one winding.

Steve

M R Radios   C M Tubes
#17

Steve Davis Wrote:
Art Hoch Wrote:2nd try today:

I reversed the connections to adjust for a different winding direction....same result.

Art, when you say you reversed the connections, did you reverse the connections on both windings? If so, that would not change the relationship between the windings. You would want to reverse the connection on only one winding.

Steve
*****************************
Yes, I reversed both. Does it matter which one? Have to leave it lay for a couple days. Will try again later.

Art
#18

May 16

Think I made a little progress today. I re-wound the coil to the specs (ohms) listed in the schematic...I did not pay attention to the # of turns...just the ohm meter. I have 2.4 ohms on the primary (1-2 lugs) and 3.5 ohms on the other (3-4 lugs). That's what the schem says.

When I jumped the connections I had squeal with the Philco tuner set about 1000. A nearby good transistor squealed about 1500 kHz and about 580-600 kHz. I then shut the radio down and soldered the connections; fired up the Philco and the squeals remained. So I think the oscillator is working...isn't it?

The speaker of the Philco has a very slight hum...that's all.

I'd appreciate suggestions what to do next. Do I start adjusting the IF coils or is there something I'm missing still?

Thanks.
Art
#19

>I re-wound the coil to the specs (ohms) listed in the schematic...I did not pay attention >to the # of turns...just the ohm meter. I have 2.4 ohms on the primary (1-2 lugs) and 3.5 >ohms on the other (3-4 lugs). That's what the schem says.

In reality the resistance isn't the important factor. What matters is the inductance. That's what makes up half of the tuned circuit. The inductance and the capacitance. Now if you are very lucky and you just so happen to pick the same gauge wire as the original then you might have a chance at coming close to the proper inductance on the primary. That's the important part. The secondary is a feedback winding that causes the circuit to oscillate. Not so critical. If you look at just the resistance you would think that the secondary is longer than the primary because it has more resistance. But I know that the secondary only needs to be about 20 percent of the primary for the oscillator to run properly. So the secondary must be wound with small gauge wire or the resistance measurements are wrong. Here's a link to one I did awhile back on a 1936 Philco 600.

http://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=2139

Terry

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#20

If you look at just the resistance you would think that the secondary is longer than the primary because it has more resistance. But I know that the secondary only needs to be about 20 percent of the primary for the oscillator to run properly. So the secondary must be wound with small gauge wire or the resistance measurements are wrong.

So is the suggestion to remove much of the secondary wire because it's longer than the primary at this point? If so how many turns? I have about 140 turns right now on the secondary. If so, why does the schem have quite a bit higher resistance measure for the secondary over the primary? I know about inductance but there must be a formula or something to calculate that. Sorry I'm not very "electrical." I'm more eclectic. Icon_crazy
#21

No no I was just making the point that the resistance doesn't really mean much when you are working with tuned circuits. Other than whether good (showing a low resistance) or bad (open)
140t might be a little too much but once you get it working what will happen is it won't tune up to the top end of the band. Worst case you'll have to remove some turns from the primary. On my model 600 it should tune up to 1800kc but will only go up to 1500kc. I need to remove a few turns from the primary.
Terry

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Ok MrFixr55,  I have tried the DeoxIT D5 on the band switch and even though it has relieved the tension I felt when turn...osanders0311 — 11:11 AM
Part numbers to model cross
Is there a reference somewhere where you can punch in Philco part numbers and see what models those parts were used in?Jim Dutridge — 10:17 AM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Hi OSanders, Look carefully at the band switch. Turn it slowly and "wiggle" it around the desired band. ...MrFixr55 — 12:33 AM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
I think that RCA and GE introduced metal tubes in the USA in 1936.  I don't know if they were being made by RCA, GE or b...MrFixr55 — 11:20 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Vlad95, Thank you for the stringing guides and wow there are so manyosanders0311 — 06:01 PM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
A pre war Hallicrafters, and an early one too, very nice! 1936 is pretty early for metal tubes too, which would explain ...Arran — 05:58 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Thanks Rod, "When you hear the background hiss and no station it usually indicates that the oscillator quit" ...osanders0311 — 05:52 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
RodB :beerchug:Vlad95 — 10:22 AM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Vlad, you nailed it. Swiss and German roots.RodB — 09:54 AM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
Well this is a Hallicrafters SX/9 circa 1936. No real issues so far although I dodged a real bullet with a cap that was...bridkarl — 07:59 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>