Variation with the 37-650
Posts: 236
Threads: 30
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Minneapolis/St. Paul MN
This question is primarily for Ron, but if anyone else has info as well, feel free to chime in.
I noted in the Philco Gallery a different variation on the 37-650 console. On that one, there are a couple of horizontal inlays on both side of the dial, and on mine, which is pictured in a previous thread on the Phorum:
http://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=2
...it has 2 thin vertical inlays about 4 inces either side of the dial. This is the version of the 37-650 I've seen elsewhere besides the one I have. Otherwise, the two appear to be identical in every other aspect.
I'm just wondering if there is documentation regarding the two versions of this console, and how common it was to have this or other variations on other Philco models.
Thanks in advance for anything you can provide.
Bill
Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
Posts: 69
Threads: 14
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Woburn, MA
Hi Bill,
Just an observation, but your radio appears to match with the 37-2650X in the gallery  :
http://www.philcoradio.com/gallery/1937a.htm#bh
Paul
Posts: 236
Threads: 30
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Minneapolis/St. Paul MN
You're right, Paul. That's pretty interesting. The variation could be indicated in the similar model numbers such as 37-650 and 37-2650.
Looking at the production figures, it does indicate totals include both models, so I guess that makes sense.
Paging Mr. Philco!  Your thoughts?
Bill
Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Let me look into this and get back to you. Bill, as you know, I've been "out of the loop" for awhile, so do you have a picture of your 37-650 posted here or elsewhere?
EDIT: I just noticed the link in your post above, Bill. DOH!!! Your 37-650 is a very nice set.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
OOPS!!! I don't often make mistakes  but I see I have an incorrect photo in the Gallery. What is labeled a 37-650X is actually a 37-630X. I'll make the corrections later today.
Oh, and Bill, if you'd like to allow use of your 37-650X in the Gallery, I'd be honored...thanks.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 236
Threads: 30
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Minneapolis/St. Paul MN
Actually, the honor would be all mine.
Do you need a photo that is reformatted, or is the one posted adequate? Let me know what you need.
Nonetheless, this was an interesting topic. I looked at the cabinet label and couldn't find anything that indicated "37-2650" anywhere, but the "37-650" was big and bold.
Goes to show we all learn something new all the time in the world of old radios. 
Bill
Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
O.K., folks, Bill's 37-650X photo is now in the Philco Radio Gallery for the first half of the 1937 season (June 1936).
http://www.philcoradio.com/gallery/1937a.htm#at
Many thanks to Bill for allowing use of his photo. And my sincere apologies for the initial error in pictures. Dealing with the sheer number of Philco models produced, the occasional error is bound to creep in.  But at least in HTML format, changes/corrections can be easily made.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 236
Threads: 30
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Minneapolis/St. Paul MN
Ron,
Always happy to help out any way I can.
Now, I'm assuming the other picture was of a 37-630, which was a terrific shot. Are you going to use that one in place of the catalog picture?
Bill
Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Yup, I'll make that correction also...
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
|
Recent Posts
|
|
1949 Motorola 5A9M
|
| Thx Richard.
Arran, the 0.02 caps in mine are also 100v. As I mentioned the original paper tube is just a little small...klondike98 — 01:02 PM |
|
New find. 91X code 225
|
| Nice job there. A very distinguished looking radio. Would like to see a photo when done with added light. Paul B.Paul Philco322 — 12:27 PM |
|
New find. 91X code 225
|
| Thanks all. Yeah, I was motivated to do this one and they're generally easy to work on.
I don't do a lot of early-'30s...pdieten — 10:22 AM |
|
1949 Motorola 5A9M
|
| Hello Bob,
What nice looking set it looks like a Emerson that I have you did great job with the two Electrolytic cans ....radiorich — 02:04 AM |
|
New find. 91X code 225
|
| Hello Paul,
Well, done it looks great !
Sincerely Richardradiorich — 01:55 AM |
|
New find. 91X code 225
|
| Congratulations, Paul! That was quick...you made short order of that chassis restoration! And no coils to rewind...bonus...NostalgiaRadioTime — 01:07 AM |
|
1949 Motorola 5A9M
|
| Bob;
I was thinking the same with that 150 ohm resistor, put a larger value replacement in it's place to compensate f...Arran — 01:02 AM |
|
New find. 91X code 225
|
| And the chassis is all done, all caps and bad lamp wiring replaced, power switch repaired and in place, dial string tune...pdieten — 12:37 AM |
|
1949 Motorola 5A9M
|
| As I think more about that 150 ohm resistor that directly follows the selenium diode, I’m going to have to add some seri...klondike98 — 11:47 PM |
|
1949 Motorola 5A9M
|
| It looks like all the resistors except one are OK. Arran mentioned replacing the sand 150 ohm resistor and mine looks l...klondike98 — 02:25 PM |
|
Who's Online
|
There are currently 1190 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1189 Guest(s)
|
|
|
|
 
|
![[-]](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/bootbb/collapse.png "[-]")
