Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

I do not care what anyone says
#1

Listen guys.. I do will not change my mind on what anyone else puts on this board, But my 38-116 console in my own radio collection is the best sounding radio I own... And Thanks to all your help insisting I change out a couple of tubes that might have been weak! Thanks again. Would love too know how the other owners think about their console...
#2

My 38-116 is probably my best sounding console.It will probably improve bass when I build a back for it.I'll eventually restore my 1947 Magnavox Belvedere and suspect it will give the Philco a challenge. Later Hi Fi AM radios in my collection are excluded from the comparison.
#3

PJ, I restored one electrically for a friend but never got to listen to it in the cabinet with the back. It sounded really nice with the speaker setting on the bench. I would guess great in the cabinet with the back. Really a great radio.
Jerry

A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
#4

second best sounding AM radio I own.
#5

Mine is excellent. It plays as well as my 38-690 and they are my two best players. I am lucky to have each.

Steve
#6

Steve.... What would you say the difference is between the 690 and the 116.. I do not think I will not be so lucky to find a 690 for a reasonable cost. And I dont think I will ever hear one up close to hear the difference. What would you say the difference is since you have both consoles.... Thanks in advance ......
#7

And Steve you are lucky to have both. Enjoy them and If you can send use a pic or two of both your radios.
#8

I am out of town this week so I'll send pics next week. I really can't tell the difference in sound quality between the two. They both play very well. I don't think you are missing much with a 38 116 from the 690. The 690 uses a pot for bass control (left side switch). That may be the only real difference that I could tell as I can really vary the bass anyway I want.

Steve




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
My Philco 37-116 Restore
I found I have a cracked 6J5 (AVC) tube. Since the tube shields are so tight I must have broke the tube putting the shie...dconant — 05:32 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Looks like I made a mistake. I painted my tube shields silver. Now the reception is poor and can't really zero in on mos...dconant — 01:10 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
I did R73 RCA. It has a phenolic board with all stuff mounted on it. And the wiring is deep under everything including ...morzh — 10:37 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Hi Keith, here is an article that covers different FM detector circuits including a section on the theory and alignment ...462ron — 08:26 AM
462ron
Well then Dan I guess this old man’s memory wasn’t too foggy :lolno: although I couldn’t remember where I saw that upgra...462ron — 08:08 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Fortunately, I did not have to do much to my GE S-22 (RCA R7A) Almost all caps and the 2 audio transformers packed into...MrFixr55 — 07:44 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Yup Arran is correct it is missing the pushbutton covers. I don't know where they all go but it's a common issue on this...Radioroslyn — 06:48 AM
48-482 rear panel help
I also have one of these, again it never had a back, and no trace of one. I have been told that the pushbuttons used to ...Arran — 03:29 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks Joseph. Hope you get to restore your 48-482 before too long!keithchip — 02:12 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
RCAs ain't no cake either.morzh — 10:32 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>