Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

I do not care what anyone says
#1

Listen guys.. I do will not change my mind on what anyone else puts on this board, But my 38-116 console in my own radio collection is the best sounding radio I own... And Thanks to all your help insisting I change out a couple of tubes that might have been weak! Thanks again. Would love too know how the other owners think about their console...
#2

My 38-116 is probably my best sounding console.It will probably improve bass when I build a back for it.I'll eventually restore my 1947 Magnavox Belvedere and suspect it will give the Philco a challenge. Later Hi Fi AM radios in my collection are excluded from the comparison.
#3

PJ, I restored one electrically for a friend but never got to listen to it in the cabinet with the back. It sounded really nice with the speaker setting on the bench. I would guess great in the cabinet with the back. Really a great radio.
Jerry

A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
#4

second best sounding AM radio I own.
#5

Mine is excellent. It plays as well as my 38-690 and they are my two best players. I am lucky to have each.

Steve
#6

Steve.... What would you say the difference is between the 690 and the 116.. I do not think I will not be so lucky to find a 690 for a reasonable cost. And I dont think I will ever hear one up close to hear the difference. What would you say the difference is since you have both consoles.... Thanks in advance ......
#7

And Steve you are lucky to have both. Enjoy them and If you can send use a pic or two of both your radios.
#8

I am out of town this week so I'll send pics next week. I really can't tell the difference in sound quality between the two. They both play very well. I don't think you are missing much with a 38 116 from the 690. The 690 uses a pot for bass control (left side switch). That may be the only real difference that I could tell as I can really vary the bass anyway I want.

Steve




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Vlad; Yes it's very similar, Motorola obviously wanted to get the most use they could out of the dyes used to stamp o...Arran — 11:18 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Rod; I that 27 pf 1 kv capacitor you found a C0G ceramic cap or just a regular ceramic cap? A different topic but I t...Arran — 11:16 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; It's possible that the tar/bitumen using to pot the box may have lead to the failure of the transformer, either...Arran — 10:28 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Hi OSanders. another thing about the loop antenna is that it is directional. Try turning the radio in different direct...MrFixr55 — 09:19 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
The 630v caps will do just fine. Physical size increases with capacity values and voltage. You don't have to replace 200...RodB — 09:09 PM
Help with Supreme 599
Good catch. The 589 is a better schematic but i dont understand how the voltage goes thru the meter to adj the line volt...daveone23 — 08:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Arron, Yes, I can see the differences in the interior design, but if you compare the schematics, they look very similar...Vlad95 — 06:57 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
I am not sure how the loop antenna supposed to work but think I have figured it out. I had one lead on terminal 1 and go...osanders0311 — 06:56 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thx Vlad.klondike98 — 06:54 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Hi Arran. I continue to disassemble and I see that the interstage transformer is completely beyond repair. It is placed...Vlad95 — 06:50 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>