Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Crosley 10-136
#1

Good morning

I have a Crosley 10-136  http://www.nostalgiaair.org/Resources/172/M0003172.htm

I have recapped it and it plays but there is a problem with the Vol so I thought I need to check it out especially since it looks as though it has been replaced. The Pot Resistance show 500k the Print shows it should be 3 meg and a tap at 300k ( parts list). I googled 3meg pot and the highest I see is 1meg and see no tap. Any suggestions on what to do? I have a couple of sites to try yet but I'm not hopeful. Thanks

Eric
#2

Hey Eric,
Not quite sure why they spec such a high value control. The one thing that comes to mind is the it does act as a bit of a load for the phono. The higher the input load the better the frequency response with a crystal cartridge. The tap is for audio frequency compensation (tone) at low volume levels.
Given the type of set and size of the speaker I would think that if you did change out the control the difference would be negligible.

 Terry
#3

Terry,
I sent an email to Mark Oppat to see what he has and I was poking around Play Things of the Past and did find some tapped 3 meg pots he doesn't say if they have switches but will wait till I hear from Mark before contacting him.

What got me looking was the low volume even when turned up all the way and figured it was the 500k pot.

Eric
#4

For grins you could turn the volume full up and disconnect the ground (B-) side of the volume control. This will give you flat out all she'll do volume wise.

Terry
#5

For a test, I have tack soldered together a series of 3 or 4 fixed resistors totaling the value of a POT and connected the center tap to a clip lead, moved to different points between resistors to check. It'll give you an idea of where things stand with parts you may have on hand.

If I could find the place called "Somewhere", I could find "Anything" Icon_confused

Tim

Jesus cried out and said, "Whoever believes in me , believes not in me but in him who sent me" John 12:44
#6

Ok I got the correct pot but which is the 300k tap? The lead going to the .002 cap and on to the 12AV6? Or the 680K/47K lead I suspect the later but I want to be sure as the quality of the print is not that good.

Eric




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
1949 Motorola 5A9M
bob  Nice work on battery . If you don't. Have terminals i have a few spares  Samsam — 02:12 AM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
hello mr Fixr, for sure !! I have some radios that I need to make some batteries for too. Sincerely richardradiorich — 12:33 AM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Dittos, sweet b on the battery. Love the "9 Lives" logo, remembered from my childhood. Other neat ones are t...MrFixr55 — 11:24 PM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
Hi Morzh, Dunno if the AC EMI caps are an issue. I never liked the concept but never had an issue with these causin...MrFixr55 — 11:21 PM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
And no hum without the 7AF7? Not common but I am thinking heater - cathode short. This would introduce hum in this sta...MrFixr55 — 11:14 PM
schematics
Those filter caps in the cardboard tube are easy to restuff, especially the kind with the rolled over end. You don't hav...Arran — 09:56 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
If you have 5 wires, do this: The wires that go to thick-wire wound winding are the filament. If you do not know wha...morzh — 09:03 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
I recently acquired a Philco Model 16 Code 126. I removed the power transformer to place heat shrink on some very bad...bobclausen — 08:23 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Hello Bob, That battery looks great nice job ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 08:20 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Yes, I plan to put a Velcro closer on the top.klondike98 — 07:28 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>