Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

PHILCO 70 VS 90
#1

I am looking to obtain a Philco Cathedral. I have seen a number of 70's and 90's for sale on E-Bay and elsewhere. Is the 90 that much of a better performer than the 70 that it is priced so much higher at auctions, etc? From what I have read, the 70 performs quite well and there isn't that much of a difference between the two except for two tubes.

Any insight would be helpful.

Thanks to all
#2

Hi Madghost,
There are some differences. Just glancing at the schematic the 70 volume control is in the antenna circuit. The 90 has its own 2nd detector and avc. The 70 looks to me that it doesn't. Also The volume is also controlled by changing the bias on the cathodes of two of the 24 tubes on the 70. The 90 also has two stages of audio amplification before the final output tube. The 70 uses the same tube as the 2nd detector and audio amplifaction.
I'm sure Ron and Chuck could tell you more. Both of my 90's play great. With a good antenna I pick up many stations across the dial. Sorry to say I have never listened a 70. Icon_sad

Hope this helps
Terry
#3

And there are three versions of the Mdoel 90, the origninal; Early, Mid and Late.

See the Early Cathedrals section of my site.
#4

Hi Madghost

The early 70 and early 90 (using two Type 45 output tubes) share the same front end, and neither have AVC.

The "mid" 90, the most common version with a single Type 47 output, uses AVC which makes a HUGE improvement in performance; i.e. no "blasting" as you tune across the dial, and less prone to fading.

The late 90 (push-pull 47 outputs) and late 70 both have autodyne converters, and both have AVC, so again their front ends are similar.

Both are good performers. To make a long story short, the 90 has extra amplification in its audio section. It is slightly larger than the 70. And there is just something special about it, I guess, that makes it more desirable. Icon_smile

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thx Richard. Arran, the 0.02 caps in mine are also 100v. As I mentioned the original paper tube is just a little small...klondike98 — 01:02 PM
New find. 91X code 225
Nice job there. A very distinguished looking radio. Would like to see a photo when done with added light. Paul B.Paul Philco322 — 12:27 PM
New find. 91X code 225
Thanks all. Yeah, I was motivated to do this one and they're generally easy to work on. I don't do a lot of early-'30s...pdieten — 10:22 AM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Hello Bob, What nice looking set it looks like a Emerson that I have you did great job with the two Electrolytic cans ....radiorich — 02:04 AM
New find. 91X code 225
Hello Paul, Well, done it looks great ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 01:55 AM
New find. 91X code 225
Congratulations, Paul! That was quick...you made short order of that chassis restoration! And no coils to rewind...bonus...NostalgiaRadioTime — 01:07 AM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Bob; I was thinking the same with that 150 ohm resistor, put a larger value replacement in it's place to compensate f...Arran — 01:02 AM
New find. 91X code 225
And the chassis is all done, all caps and bad lamp wiring replaced, power switch repaired and in place, dial string tune...pdieten — 12:37 AM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
As I think more about that 150 ohm resistor that directly follows the selenium diode, I’m going to have to add some seri...klondike98 — 11:47 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
It looks like all the resistors except one are OK. Arran mentioned replacing the sand 150 ohm resistor and mine looks l...klondike98 — 02:25 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1141 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1140 Guest(s)
Avatar

>