Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Suggestions, please (Majestic Model 20)
#16

I might try an outboard bias resistor. As for the output transformer, it's fine. I've even tried another transformer in there that closely matches p-p 45's.

The interstage transformer seems to be quite well matched. I get nice clean audio out of the secondary. In fact, I can drive a high impedence speaker directly from the interstage transformer at a good volume.
#17

Well.... color me stoopid....

I've solved the entire problem with the output on this radio. It sounds quite nice now, as long as I keep the volume level below the level the signal itself distorts going through the RF/IF chain. I get at least a good 2 volt signal across the voice coil before clipping. I'm not familiar with the voice coil impedence on this speaker, so can't compute the RMS power, but it's quite loud.

Now, wouldn't you like to know what the problem was? Wouldn't ya?

Well, let me tell you.. some idiot who shall remain ME connected the interstage transformer to the plates and the output transformer to the grids of the 45's. It's a wonder that a) any audio made it through to the speaker at all and b) the grids didn't melt down with B+ on them. I might have caught my error sooner if the grids had ANY DC bias on them at all (or maybe I should have taken better notes when I disconnected all the leads from the bottom plate..)

I'm sure that the 45's are probably pretty damaged at this point, so it's a good thing I have some more coming in. At least the radio is working and I can honestly say that I've tackled one of the biggest PITA radios in existance, and come out the winner.

What makes it even more amazing is that when I got the radio, it was in the form of a 3-D jigsaw puzzle. The cabinet was totally disassembled, the speaker lying on top of the chassis, the knobs broken off (not the shafts), the tuning mechanism broken, the power transformer extra crispy and literally everything in the filter can needed to be replaced (except the RF choke, but rather than re-use that and have it go out later, I just bought a new 50uH RF choke and replaced everything in the can.

I wish to thank everyone here that helped me with this set. All help is greatly appreciated.

Take care, and stay well.
#18

I don't know if the #45s would be damaged or not from hooking them up that way, at least not for the short period of time that they were hooked up wrong. I think if you test the #45s, and they come up good, that will be the end of it, there just isn't a lot to them since they have a directly heated cathode.
Don't feel bad about it, with a Canadian Westinghouse 801 I was working on last summer I got a similar level of performance to that Majestic model 20. At first I though maybe the audio interstage was stuffed, it wasn't, nor was the output transformer, the voltages were all there. Then my uncle figured it could be an alignment problem since I had to replace one of the IF cans, it did not make a difference. Then we had a look at the tube layout diagram, when I replaced the tubes I got the lead for the IF amp tube and the second detector mixed up. You see in the Westinghouse 801 just because the grid lead is near a tube did not mean that it connected to that tube. So we swapped them around and the set nearly blew my eardrums out.
I think that every one of us has caused a self inflicted snag at one time or another, wrong lead connected to wrong tube pin, wrong tube in wrong socket, etc. I still do this from time to time which is why if I really go at a radio I check my work two or three times comparing it to the diagram, it's easy to do on something like an octal socket.
Regards
Arran
Arran
#19

Speaking of the Majestic model 20, look what I found while looking for details about a G.E model 140:

http://www.mcclellans.com/Majestic20restore.htm

Right at the top it says, "A Radio To Avoid", oh brother! It looks like Brenda Ann wasn't the only one who had trouble with one of these old pigs.
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Ron and Mike I mentioned a 2 meg resistor not on the schematic. I stumbled on a changes note in Riders that mentioned th...dconant — 12:02 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Here you go: Your the code 125Radioroslyn — 11:12 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi Ron, Thanks for the input. I think I'm going to call it good enough. It does seem weird I can usually dial in othe...dconant — 08:01 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome, the radio looks intimating 11 tubes, wish you well.Jimradio — 07:49 AM
462ron
Hi Dan, it’s been 10 years since I restored the electronics on my 37-116 so I’m going on some foggy memories. I remember...462ron — 07:37 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>