Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

1931-32 big chassis output tube changes ?
#1

I was wondering what the performance differences were with the change mid season in the 1931 Model 112, from the 45 output tubes to 47's. Then the following year the big 11 tube chassis made another change to the 42's for the output (model 15). Which of these three is considered the "Better" tube with best sound ?
#2

With the understanding that "better" and "best sound" can be quite subjective, here goes my two cents' worth:

The Type 47 tube offered a higher power output than did the Type 45. I don't have a tube manual in front of me and am, frankly, too lazy to go look it up right now; but the power increase of using two 47 tubes in push-pull was substantial over the Type 45.

Type 42 tubes are very similar in electrical characteristics to Type 47, yet offer the advantages of slightly higher power output, an indirectly heated cathode, a 6.3V filament, and the ability to handle higher plate and screen voltages (thus giving the slightly higher power output over Type 47).

On paper at least, one would believe that Models 15X and 15DX would have quite an advantage over Model 112. Better, more efficient tubes, two speakers instead of one, and the most refinements of the large chassis Philco sets.

I've listened to 112 sets with Type 45 and Type 47 output tubes, and have owned a 15X in the past. I couldn't really tell much of a difference in the sound qualities of the various models. The twin speakers used in Model 15 do not really seem to give it an advantage in fidelity; after all, these are AM-only receivers, and the fidelity was thus limited even back in the days before NRSC.

Model 111 does not count, as these sets use the older Philco speaker with the stiff center spider, which severely limits its fidelity. Recone one of those speakers and use a better spider, and you will unleash its true potential - sound quality equivalent to Model 112.

I suppose this doesn't really answer your question, but it is one man's opinion. That's all. Icon_smile

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Thanks Ron, that actually does ansear my general question. Looks like philco was going for a power increase with the tube changes. My 112 lowboy has the 47's and I enjoy it's performance...it helps that WNBP 'The Legends' is very close to me and comes through very strongly.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Another amp build - here I go again!
How many amps a man can have? I say, as many as the space can hold.morzh — 10:01 AM
Value of capacitor
>>>It currently has an .005 1000 volt electrolytic that is at least 40 years old. That needs to go. There i...morzh — 10:00 AM
One irritating little amp - VM 557
The VM amps were kinda weird, but as you say, they did work well until they didn't. I just got a bag full of new tube so...TV MAN — 08:56 AM
Another amp build - here I go again!
I have a pair of Mk3 Dynas and they always sounded great with plenty of punch. 6550 is the same as a KT88 except usually...TV MAN — 08:45 AM
philco predicta
As Mr. Fix says, this is a live chassis so without an isolation transformer, it can be dangerous to work on. There's goo...TV MAN — 08:33 AM
Value of capacitor
If this helps you sort it out just remember 10,000 mmfd or pf = .01 mfd. So 5,000mmfd = .005 mfd.Radioroslyn — 04:23 PM
Value of capacitor
OP here- the parts list calls for an .005 1000 volt mica. It currently has an .005 1000 volt electrolytic that is at lea...bridkarl — 02:09 PM
Value of capacitor
Maybe it's one of those paper caps that is wrapped in a mica-lookiing case.RodB — 01:51 PM
Value of capacitor
I also was wondering what the post about using polarized caps had to do with the subject? The cap is 5nF, does not exis...morzh — 10:22 AM
Value of capacitor
The OP stated that there is an electrolytic in the circuit in place of the coupling cap and wondered what effect it has....RodB — 09:53 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>