Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 89 Gee whiz
#1

I decided to work on a philco 89 Cathedral set. Someone had started it before me so A bunch of things were un hooked. 
Then I realized that it was different code 123 from the schematic I had. 
Mine had the 36 instead of the 77. It also had two installed but unused bakelite block in it. 
They had never been soldered on. 

I finally got everything back where it should go, I must rewire going to speaker. Then the smoke test.
#2

Did you happen to look here for helpful info?

http://www.philcoradio.com/tech/89evol.htm

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Yes I did that was where I found the schematic closest to the radio. With exception of the unused bakelight blocks.
#4

 Philco was a company that was know for thrift, it doesn't seem likely that they would screw two Bakelite block capacitors under a chassis without hooking them up. More then likely whomever messed around with this radio in the past either disconnected them, or added the caps without hooking them up. What will tell the story would be the part numbers engraved in the sides.
Regards
Arran
#5

(01-27-2016, 03:00 AM)Arran Wrote:   Philco was a company that was know for thrift, it doesn't seem likely that they would screw two Bakelite block capacitors under a chassis without hooking them up. More then likely whomever messed around with this radio in the past either disconnected them, or added the caps without hooking them up. What will tell the story would be the part numbers engraved in the sides.
Regards
Arran

what tells the story is there has never been a spec of solder on these lugs. So no one bypassed them.  They are factory new.
#6

Ron would know for sure, but is there a chance this chassis may have been used in other model Philco radios?  That could explain the extra bakelites if this was being built for a different model, then pulled for an 89 instead.  Just a thought, and my two cents worth.  Take care, Gary

"Don't pity the dead, pity the living, above all, those living without love."
Professor Albus Dumbledore
Gary - Westland Michigan
#7

There were so many different versions of the Code 123 version of the 89 that some of these parts were added then removed. This was in between versions so it does not surprise me that there are some unused parts on the chasiis




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
Just forget this number, it is useless anyway. Simply proceed with your project.morzh — 10:08 PM
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
My $0.02 is that it is a misprint. I tried to look up the value for the similar 84 and 37-84, and ther is no resistance...MrFixr55 — 09:51 PM
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
Thanks for the quick reply! Hmm...well that's good, so what am I seeing that's 1042 ohms on the schematic for the pow...Mike L — 08:46 PM
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
The DC resistance of the primary is 8 to 9 Ohm.morzh — 07:54 PM
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
I have a feeling the primary winding on the power transformer is bad. My resistance reading on the primary side is 9 ohm...Mike L — 07:48 PM
Rusty Tuning Condenser
I would try Naval Jelly and use a soaked pipe cleaner to get it where it needs to go.RossH — 06:56 PM
38-10T chassis Restoration begins
Hello Dconant , they sold mica to use as a insulator between transistors and their heatsinks too. Rob I will remove th...radiorich — 02:52 PM
38-10T chassis Restoration begins
Thanks for the info guys. I always wondered why the use of mica. Now I know.dconant — 01:52 PM
38-10T chassis Restoration begins
Most common plastics have a dielectric constant in the 3-4 range whereas mica is around 6. This means that even if you w...Steve D — 01:46 PM
38-10T chassis Restoration begins
It is acceptable but not desirable. Plastic is not an approved cap dielectric, and even though a reasonably thick piece...morzh — 11:52 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>