Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Output transformer secondary Lugs for PP42 on Model 650?
#1

I am replacing an output transformer on a model 650. I have a Hammond 125E output transformer. I'm trying to determine which lugs to connect to the speaker from the secondary. Please educate me. I'm halfway there. I was looking at Franks Electron tube data sheets page. The RCA literature for the 42 tube in push pull configuration says the load impedance is 10,000 ohms. Is this the info used for determining the correct output transformer secondary lugs? The speaker voice coil is about 1 ohm. So I would think that the secondary lugs 4 & 5 on the Hammond 125E would be correct. Is my thinking correct? Thanks for your help. Dave


Attached Files Image(s)
   
#2

The original transformer matched 5,900 ohm load impedance to a 1.25 ohm voice coil impedance.

Using the chart above, secondary lugs 1 and 3 will give the closest match.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Typically triodes have a lower plate impedance than pentodes. Even pentodes that are wired as a triode. When trying find the proper impedance most tube manuals don't list penodes in that configuration. Good thing Ron has the info for the original.

Terry
#4

Thank you. Glad I'm checking with the experts. So on the RCA tube data sheet, the option with the screen grid connected to plate in push pull configuration would be the correct load impedance? 6000 ohms? fixed bias. 

Thanks again, 

Dave
#5

Dave (Sourbone)

Did you see my post #2 above?

The info was taken from original Philco documentation.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#6

Ron, I have the schematic and parts list. I didn't see the info there. If I encounter this replacement on another radio, what source should I refer to. Thanks for your help always. 

Dave
#7

Hey Ron, Thanks for keeping the phorum running. It's terrific. 




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
@ Joseph, get off the porch and run with the dogs. You fixed one, grab another. @ Morzh, I think that we are the same ...MrFixr55 — 08:59 PM
Philco Model 249 made in England
Wow! Now that is something! I’ve never seen a Philco like that, but it’s pretty mid-century.jrblasde — 06:40 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
I've run the radio for a couple of hours today, and all is well. It's a remarkable sounding radio! I'll go ahead and upl...jrblasde — 06:05 PM
Philco Model 249 made in England
Gary - Thanks for responding!  I hadn't actually taken possession of it at the time of my post but since you said it was...fklown — 03:32 PM
Philco model 40-100
Marion; Replacing volume controls was something some service shops did in years gone by to make a little extra profit...Arran — 03:24 PM
Philco Model 249 made in England
Welcome to the Phorum, fklown!  That's one heck of a Philco 'yardstick' you've got there!  Could you possibly post a clo...GarySP — 03:19 PM
Philco model 40-100
Arran, Thank you so much for your assistance and the link to the fleabay listing! They say a picture is worth a thousan...mhamby — 01:43 PM
Philco Model 249 made in England
I wonder if anyone has any information or experience with this model.  My internet searches are coming up with nothing. ...fklown — 11:40 AM
Road Trip for a Philco 46-480
Good morning, folks! I’ve finished the cabinet and the electrical restoration, and have detailed those in their respecti...jrblasde — 10:56 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Arran, Thanks for checking you manuals. I appreciate that. Let me know what you find. PhilPdouglaski — 08:46 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 446 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 445 Guest(s)
Avatar

>