Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Value of a Philco 41-287
#1

Yesterday, at a local thrift store I found a Philco 41-287 ? Not able to see the actual nameplate. The price was $90.00
Case was ok, grill cloth torn.  Is this a fare price? Icon_crazy
 
#2

Welcome to the Phorum!
Icon_wave

Here's a pic of a 41-287x, is this what you found?

As to value, it depends entirely on whether its worth $90 to you. Others may have a different opinion but if the chassis is in good shape, ie. not a lot of rust and looks clean, and all the tubes are there it may be an OK price. You can always offer them less and work your way up. Keep in mind that unless its been electronically restored you will need to have that done before playing it.
#3

Thank you the picture is positively the radio in question. I will have to convince my better half that there is room for this one if I can haggle the price down. The chassis looked rust free and tubes appear to be all there. Hopefully they will be able to move it out from where it is now. ( They are remodeling the store, big mess. )
Once again thank you!
#4

 One thing to keep in mind with many of these 1941 models is that they used a Tenite plastic escutcheon, pushbuttons, and knobs that are often warped, shrunken, or otherwise disintegrating, and you will be looking at another $60+ to replace those with reproductions. Then you have the rubber/gutta percha covered wiring which is usually shot, and last but not least an open primary on the output transformer. This is assuming that the cabinet is in good shape and does not require any refinishing or repair work. So no, $90 is too much money in my opinion, I would try to pay as little as possible for it, maybe no more then $40 $50 if you really like it, preferably less.
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I was just reminded of something else, I'm not sure why but many Rogers built sets do seem to have open primari...Arran — 04:40 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RpdB I don't think there's much difference with interstage transformers of different models other than dimersion...Vlad95 — 03:27 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I looks like your set has the same problem that mine did, both a bad output transformer, and a bad audio inters...Arran — 03:21 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Ouch! Not often the secondary takes a hit. Wish there was a better solution. I have a good interstage transformer but it...RodB — 02:59 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
By the way, the bypass you suggested is a rare solution in some circuits. For example, this schematics solution is used...Vlad95 — 01:43 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
No, you are wrong, because you did not know the details. Unfortunately, only ONE winding out of six is intact in both t...Vlad95 — 01:14 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
The output 45s are still in push-pull because the transformer secondary winding is still in the grid circuit providing o...RodB — 11:52 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RodB for the help. But this is not a real solution to this situation, not even a temporary one. Because the firs...Vlad95 — 11:34 AM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
I was going to check the voltages as you suggested and hooked it up to my dim bulb. It appears I have a short. The bul...bobclausen — 10:34 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
You can bypass the interstage transformer by disconnecting the primary, connect a load resistor of about 10k - 20k to th...RodB — 09:40 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1001 online users. [Complete List]
» 4 Member(s) | 997 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar

>