Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

37-116 or 38-116, which is a better performer?
#1

Since we are on the subject of mirf's 38-116, which one tends to be the better performer? Does anyong out there have both to compare? Are they the same chassis with the exception of the output tubes?
#2

They are close.
Triodes are considered very good in pushpull and 37 has them. I would not expect any appreciable difference in overall performance. I think when comparing these without specialised equipment it will be matter of personal taste/preference/affection etc.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

There is a difference in the RF section of the 37-116 and the late model 38-116 code 125 chassis. 

The 37-116 and the early 38-116 use a simple padding arrangement for the short wave bands which tends to compress the dial scale at the high end of the bands and expand it at the low end. The later 38-116 code 125 (and the 38-690) use a different RF section with split stator tuning cap gangs which provide a more linear calibration of the dial. Many of the alignment trimmers were also eliminated with this arrangement. You can tell the revised front end by looking at the RF amp tube. It uses a round aluminum tube shield and a 6U7G instead of the 6K7G with the usual square shield.

Philco must have thought it was an improvement since they used the identical revised tuning system on the high end 38-690. 
#4

I agree with these replies.
I have both and re-capped them both.
Very similar for sure. I found the 37 was a little easier than the 38.
murf
#5

(04-14-2016, 12:05 AM)Mondial Wrote:  There is a difference in the RF section of the 37-116 and the late model 38-116 code 125 chassis. 

The 37-116 and the early 38-116 use a simple padding arrangement for the short wave bands which tends to compress the dial scale at the high end of the bands and expand it at the low end. The later 38-116 code 125 (and the 38-690) use a different RF section with split stator tuning cap gangs which provide a more linear calibration of the dial. Many of the alignment trimmers were also eliminated with this arrangement. You can tell the revised front end by looking at the RF amp tube. It uses a round aluminum tube shield and a 6U7G instead of the 6K7G with the usual square shield.

Philco must have thought it was an improvement since they used the identical revised tuning system on the high end 38-690. 

 Anything that results in a more linear tracking or stations on short wave sounds like an improvement to me.
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Road Trip for a Philco 46-480
Good morning, folks! I’ve finished the cabinet and the electrical restoration, and have detailed those in their respecti...jrblasde — 10:56 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Arran, Thanks for checking you manuals. I appreciate that. Let me know what you find. PhilPdouglaski — 08:46 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
I have some car radio service manuals, Riders I think (not to be confused with the big blue binders), so I may see if on...Arran — 01:20 AM
Philco model 40-100
Greetings; Here is an update, I found a listing on fleabay for a similar chassis to yours, and it has a photo of what...Arran — 12:58 AM
Philco model 40-100
Greetings; I think I may have found a clue as to what is missing, from a search I made, there is a rear view of the c...Arran — 12:12 AM
Philco model 40-100
I recently acquired a Philco model 40-100 farm (battery) radio. The radio was in very good condition except the red on f...mhamby — 05:59 PM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Hello, Richard the radio is an AC-2687 Studebaker model. The Philco model is S -5323 and the chassis p/n is S-5523Pdouglaski — 11:52 AM
48-482 rear panel help
The 48-482 is an AC only set as well, featuring a power transformer. While the transformer shouldn’t get “hot”, it is ye...jrblasde — 11:12 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
I gave a Chrysler/MoPar car radio from 1954, it was made by Philco, and it uses two chassis, one has the power supply an...Arran — 11:06 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Hello keithchip. You could make a hardboard back for the set, but make sure you provide plenty of ventilation holes in ...GarySP — 11:04 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 792 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 790 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>