Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Bakelite capacitor holders
#1

Can anyone explain why Philco used bakelite containers for their capacitors? I have never understood the logic of that because it makes replacing those capacitors far more difficult than I think it needs to be.
#2

Eric,

so not to repeat ourselves, we just had that discussion about a week ago right here.
Maybe Ron can find it and direct you to it.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

http://www.philcoradio.com/phorum/showth...?tid=14486  

Steve

M R Radios   C M Tubes
#4

Well...

The previous discussion was about resistors inside bakelite blocks. Eric's question is about bakelite blocks in general.

Hi Eric! Icon_smile

I think Philco did this for several reasons. I can think of a few, perhaps others will chime in with their opinions as well.

1. When Philco started producing the bakelite blocks in 1930, radio was still relatively "new" and manufacturers were still secretive about the components inside their sets. Placing capacitors inside bakelite shells added to the mystery somewhat.

2. Bakelte blocks allowed for convenient tie points for wiring including points to ground in many cases.

3. It was thought at the time that sealing the paper capacitors in high temperature wax would add to their life. Indeed, those capacitors often lasted for several decades. Of course, 80+ years on, they have all gone bad by now and require replacement. (And the wire resistors that were put into some blocks are often still good!)

That's all that I can think of right now...

Yes, they can be a pain in the you know what to replace, but the nice thing is that we can now clean out the old guts, pop in new yellow film capacitors, put the blocks back in place and you can't tell they have been touched save for the new solder on the terminals. Icon_thumbup

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Also, while its a bit more of a job for us to restuff those blocks today, back in the day when you could simply buy the appropriate replacement block, it would be easy to drop in a new one.
#6

Also popping them out is in fact easy.
We have thread on it here too.

Except the cases where for some reason the eyelets were flooded with solder. Just had one of those in 38-12. The only backelite block there. Funny thing was, no wires protruding through the eyelets when the solder was removed, and inside there were wide foil leads connected to the rivets. That caused some cleaning to be left to do after the broken apart block was extracted. Usually though this is not the case.

http://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=9107

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#7

Of all the Philco radios I have worked on over the years...and I've worked on hundreds...I have observed that Philco started filling the eyelets with solder sometime in 1936. These appeared in 1937 model Philcos and continued until they discontinued the bakelite block altogether shortly after World War II.

At the same time...1937 models Philcos were the last to use lots of bakelite blocks. 1938 models began to make more use of the conventional tubular paper capacitors; by the 1939 season, generally only one bakelite block is found: the AC line bypass.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#8

Yep, that was the bypass in 38-12.

And in 37-116 all blocks (quite a few) had eyelets filled. Wasn't too bad, but this does complicate the process just a little.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#9

(05-19-2016, 08:03 AM)klondike98 Wrote:  Also, while its a bit more of a job for us to restuff those blocks today, back in the day when you could simply buy the appropriate replacement block, it would be easy to drop in a new one.
I never thought of that; namely that Philco sold the bakelite units individually with the proper capacitors already in place.  That would serve to make replacing the capacitors that much easier.  Thanks.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Thank you sir. Yes I feel good and also relieved because this one's been weighing on me a bit.Stormlord5500 — 11:18 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
It feels good don't it? Good luck on the rest.Paul Philco322 — 11:06 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I've reinstalled the coil. Now IT'S ALIVE!!!!!! I fired up my TinySA on signal generator mode and set it to 1400Kc and ...Stormlord5500 — 11:01 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Yes, Walmart, right up there with Fluke.RodB — 11:00 AM
PT 6 chassis screws size???
it certainly won't be metric! SAE threads were all that was known then. Take care, - GaryGarySP — 10:58 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I think this thing is way more accurate than my Walmart DMM. :DStormlord5500 — 08:19 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Thankyou for the kind words sir. I double checked it with my component tester and it read 2.7 ohms at .02mH.Stormlord5500 — 08:14 AM
PT 6 chassis screws size???
Hello bridKarl, that sounds right or maybe 8/32 . Sincerely Richardradiorich — 01:00 AM
PT 6 chassis screws size???
Have this done except for missing chassis screws. It looks like 1 inch 6/32 sheet metal screw may work but can anyone s...bridkarl — 10:32 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Hello Stormlord, Well done on rewinding that coil it turned fairly good for your first one. Sincerely Richardradiorich — 09:12 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 859 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 858 Guest(s)
Avatar

>