Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

38-3 Chassis in a 38-1 cabinet?
#1

Here's a puzzler. This was just shared in the Antique Radios Facebook Group. The cabinet is a 38-1XX. But the chassis and cabinet label are for a 38-3XX. I'd wager by the evidence in the pics, that it came out of the factory this way. Any ideas, anyone?

https://omaha.craigslist.org/atq/5767389098.html

Blessings,
Jeff W.
Jonesboro, Arkansas

http://jeffsradios.weebly.com

God loves you as you are, not as you should be, because none of us are as we should be. - Brennan Manning
#2

If you want my guess, and it is only a guess because the principals involved are dead...and dead men tell no tales...and this sort of thing was not documented...

I would say that the 1938 selling season neared an end, the 1939 models were waiting in the wings, and Philco had one - or a few - 38-1 cabinets and 38-3 chassis left over.

So...they created some Phactory Phranken-Philcos utilizing the mismatched cabinets and chassis and sent them out the door to be sold.

It wouldn't be the first time they did that. I have a 200X cabinet with a 201 chassis, and it has the factory stickers inside the cabinet indicating it as a 201. One was stuck over an original 200X sticker where the "MODEL 200X" still shows.

There are other examples of Philco doing this sort of thing, some of which have been documented here in the Phorum.

Now, if that cabinet didn't have a 38-3 tube layout sticker, I would have said that it was mismatched by some "collector." But with the factory tube layout sticker indicating it as a 38-3 points to this having been done at the factory.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

I kind of figured It was something like a Phranken-Philco, based on the pictorial evidence. Thanks for that little gold nugget piece of historical info, Ron. Something like this wouldn't particularly raise the value or make it any more collectible would it?

Blessings,
Jeff W.
Jonesboro, Arkansas

http://jeffsradios.weebly.com

God loves you as you are, not as you should be, because none of us are as we should be. - Brennan Manning
#4

Not really, in my observations. It comes down to being...another console that most collectors do not want because they take up so much room.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Yup, I hear you on that. I have 5 consoles, and I plan on selling 2. The 38-1 I have is a keeper, as well as the 95 Lowboy and 41-605P, with the record changer intact. The 38-1 has a 12-tube chassis, and sounds great! The 38-3 I know only had a 9 tube chassis, so in that sense, I think that radio in the ad has an inferior chassis in an otherwise really nice cabinet.

Blessings,
Jeff W.
Jonesboro, Arkansas

http://jeffsradios.weebly.com

God loves you as you are, not as you should be, because none of us are as we should be. - Brennan Manning
#6

Kirk;
  In terms of the power output stages the 38-3 would be inferior to the 38-1, since the 38-3 employs that goofy screen grid inversion setup Philco liked to use, I other then the "magnetic tuning" (or AFC) feature of the 38-1 I don't think that there would be much difference in the front end. Since the 38-1 was a more expensive set then a 38-3 that may explain why they at some point ended up with left over 38-1 cabinets, or ran short of 38-3 cabinets one day back in 1938.
Regards
Arran
#7

Hey Arran, I think you got me confused with Kirk (old restorer). This is Jeff W.  Icon_biggrin. But yes, I see where the 38-1 would be costlier, and not sell as many. That would be another reason to have leftover cabinets. The 38-1 did have push-pull output.

Blessings,
Jeff W.
Jonesboro, Arkansas

http://jeffsradios.weebly.com

God loves you as you are, not as you should be, because none of us are as we should be. - Brennan Manning
#8

(09-09-2016, 11:20 AM)PhilcoPhan1936 Wrote:  Hey Arran, I think you got me confused with Kirk (old restorer). This is Jeff W.  Icon_biggrin. But yes, I see where the 38-1 would be costlier, and not sell as many. That would be another reason to have leftover cabinets. The 38-1 did have push-pull output.

Sorry Jeff;
  I thought that Kirk replied to this thread saying that he had a 38-1. Actaully both the 38-3 and 38-1 have a push pull power output stage, but the 38-3 uses a different circuit, actually a simplified and cheaper circuit (Philco called it screen grid inversion) that only requires the two power output tubes and a first audio tube, there is no audio interstage transformer or a phase inverter/splitter tube. Philco used this in a number of models, but probably most prolifically in the early 1940s in their 40-180, 41-280, 42-380 and related models. Some say that the sets that use a proper phase inverter setup have a fuller sound, I don't know is that is true but they do have more output power.
Regards
Arran
#9

Like Ron said, definitely examples of Phactory Phrankens out there. I have one, possibly two in my collection. That odd model 19 or 17 (need to get it out again) and my model 30 in the earlier version lowboy cabinet.

No matter where you go, there you are.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Road Trip for a Philco 46-480
Haha, thank you sir!jrblasde — 10:35 PM
Philco model 40-100
Arran, that is very true. I have 2 Mantola 419 4 tube battery sets. One is totally unrestored other than the electroly...MrFixr55 — 10:03 PM
Philco model 40-100
Hi Marion, Great solution to the problem. Of course, they did not have LEDs "back in the day". Just test...MrFixr55 — 09:51 PM
Road Trip for a Philco 46-480
Great Job Joseph! :clap: :clap: :clap:   Grab another and get started, Big Dog!MrFixr55 — 09:45 PM
Philco model 40-100
Thanks Arran and MrFixer55 for your input regarding my post. I think I will just fix the on/off flag in place so that it...mhamby — 07:19 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Thank you for the reply Arran. I will do as you suggest and report back.Stormlord5500 — 03:34 PM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Arran, Thanks for digging into your radio library. The Studebaker radio model is AC-2687/S5524. It has a power/ speaker...Pdouglaski — 02:04 PM
Philco Battery-WWII vintage
Yep. It had handles on either side, and it took two reasonably strong men to carry it. We had that Soviet FIAT 500 c...morzh — 11:45 AM
PT-6 finished!!
I’ll get on doing that and see what happens. Just to keep this all in one thread - Anyone know what length/size is u...bridkarl — 10:01 AM
Zenith H725
Hello Ed, Well done on your part anyway that radio uses neon bulbs ? Sincerely richardradiorich — 09:43 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2727 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 2724 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>