Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Here's an easy one.
#1

The 630 mentioned earlier, was pretty much a basket case and missing the bottom chassis cover. I bent one up and thought the problem was solved. While serching E- (step away from the computer) Bay, I seemed to see a picture of the bottom of this model and it was filled with vent holes. Is that right and if so how many and what size holes are they. Also are the holes continued up the sides of the cover.

Thanks as always,

Ron F
#2

Ron F

Is your 630 a console model (630X), chairside (630CSX) or radio-phono (630PF)? If it is a 630B tombstone, it did not have the bottom cover originally - at least, I've never seen one on a 620 or 630 tombstone. The bottom cover was put on the console models, I believe, more to keep curious fingers out than to electrically shield the unit. As an example of this, the 640X console has a bottom cover made of fiberboard instead of metal. Ditto the 665X and 116X consoles. Yet, the 640B and 116B do not have bottom covers, which would have been redundant anyway since you canit get any fingers under the chassis when it's in a tombstone cabinet.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Thanks Ron,

It's a 630X console. The only reason i thought it needed a cover is that it had the four holes in the chassis for the mounting screws, and I haven't seen the chassis guts that exposed before. By what you said, i'd say this unit does have some kind of cover, right?
#4

Since it is the console model, yes.

The original was full of holes, each one about 1/4" in diameter, I think. It would take you a LONG time to drill several hundred holes. You might be able to find an original - try some of the guys listed on my site's Parts Sources (Resources) page that sell used parts.
http://www.philcoradio.com/resource.htm

It's worth a try. Or just drill a bunch of holes in what you have and use it. Icon_smile Either way, you'll keep prying young (and old) fingers out of that chassis. The way the chassis is mounted in your set, a cover is a safety factor.

Good luck,

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RpdB I don't think there's much difference with interstage transformers of different models other than dimersion...Vlad95 — 03:27 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I looks like your set has the same problem that mine did, both a bad output transformer, and a bad audio inters...Arran — 03:21 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Ouch! Not often the secondary takes a hit. Wish there was a better solution. I have a good interstage transformer but it...RodB — 02:59 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
By the way, the bypass you suggested is a rare solution in some circuits. For example, this schematics solution is used...Vlad95 — 01:43 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
No, you are wrong, because you did not know the details. Unfortunately, only ONE winding out of six is intact in both t...Vlad95 — 01:14 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
The output 45s are still in push-pull because the transformer secondary winding is still in the grid circuit providing o...RodB — 11:52 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RodB for the help. But this is not a real solution to this situation, not even a temporary one. Because the firs...Vlad95 — 11:34 AM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
I was going to check the voltages as you suggested and hooked it up to my dim bulb. It appears I have a short. The bul...bobclausen — 10:34 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
You can bypass the interstage transformer by disconnecting the primary, connect a load resistor of about 10k - 20k to th...RodB — 09:40 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
So, here's Prince on stage halfway through Purple Rain when he stoops down to his tech and says "Rod, pull out that...RodB — 09:17 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1001 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 999 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>