Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

6A3 replacements
#1

I finally got my Philco 116X working, but with a borrowed pair of 6A3 output tubes. Reception and audio quality are outstanding.

Short of buying a working pair of 6A3s at current prices (thanks, audiofools) what might be recommended as replacements? 6B4G is electrically the same tube, octal base, same high prices. 

Changing the tube sockets / types is heresy to many on the forum, but this set is no beauty queen. I'd like to enjoy the set as work bench company. All electronics would be completed neatly and to a high standard, as has the rest of the chassis.

I considered using a single 6AS7 with its two sections in push-pull, or a pair of triode connected 807s with operating voltages accordingly changed. Those types are already on hand, in storage. I believe those choices could approximate present current draw from the power transformer, audio output transformer impedances, and available audio power output.

All help is greatly appreciated!

Keep warm, this weekend.

-O.B.
#2

I don't know what the audiophool prices are but you could get a pair of these used. I've bought from him before and had no problems.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1...0foD#gid=1
#3

Bob Dobush got me my pair of 6B4 for a very reasonable price.
I don't see any reason to screw up a perfectly good radio.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#4

+3 for Bob Dobush... Icon_thumbup Icon_thumbup

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

I have used Bob  Icon_thumbup No problems. One tube was noisy, he was quick to make it right. Very fast communication. And reasonable.
Joe

Joe Bratcher near Louisville, KY




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I was just reminded of something else, I'm not sure why but many Rogers built sets do seem to have open primari...Arran — 04:40 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RpdB I don't think there's much difference with interstage transformers of different models other than dimersion...Vlad95 — 03:27 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I looks like your set has the same problem that mine did, both a bad output transformer, and a bad audio inters...Arran — 03:21 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Ouch! Not often the secondary takes a hit. Wish there was a better solution. I have a good interstage transformer but it...RodB — 02:59 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
By the way, the bypass you suggested is a rare solution in some circuits. For example, this schematics solution is used...Vlad95 — 01:43 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
No, you are wrong, because you did not know the details. Unfortunately, only ONE winding out of six is intact in both t...Vlad95 — 01:14 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
The output 45s are still in push-pull because the transformer secondary winding is still in the grid circuit providing o...RodB — 11:52 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RodB for the help. But this is not a real solution to this situation, not even a temporary one. Because the firs...Vlad95 — 11:34 AM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
I was going to check the voltages as you suggested and hooked it up to my dim bulb. It appears I have a short. The bul...bobclausen — 10:34 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
You can bypass the interstage transformer by disconnecting the primary, connect a load resistor of about 10k - 20k to th...RodB — 09:40 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 997 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 995 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>