Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco model 048 set tester
#1

I am at a standstill. Got some battery packs and a new #30 tube. Few resistors had to be replaced. and restufed the capacitors.Problem with the frequency generator. I get excellent readings on my frequency counter.That's if a pull the top corner of the variable condensor towards the front of the instrument. Let it go and I loosethe signal.I cleaned the variable and resolderd all the joints and still the same problem. Any one had any experiance with a similar tunning problem.
I also replace the attenuator control .This was a 500ohm wirewound pot. I subbed with a AB 500ohm pot.Would this bother the attenuation . Not sure if the original is linear or audio I really not sure of the difference.
Thnks..
#2

Get an analog ohm meter and see where the variable capacitor is shorting out. Ususlly it's a bent leaf on one of the ends. If you can slip a piece of paper in, you should be able to find it. Otherwise there may be crud in there. And if there are trimmers, take 'em apart and clean the contacts and micas (very carefully, they are real fragile.) I usually blast away with deoxit, put a paper towel underneath, and wait a day.

If there has been trauma to the capacitor, as in a bashed in knob or some rough handling, mre severe actions might be necessary. There are some heroic examples on this forum, including mine, which is taking the D**n thing off, and boiling it for a while and then regreasing the bearing when it dries out.

Finally, look for something really simple like a rubber coated wire that has become bare and is shorting.

Good luck.
#3

Thanks I will try your ideas. This instrument has not been handled roughly . By looking at it its been well kept. On one side of the tuning cap there is an adjustment of sorts .Not sure if this is for padding .This term may be wrong . But it has an insulating material between it that is loose, but in tack. I didn't want to tight it in case it sets it out of alignment.
Well I will do some more trouble shooting in a few days..
Thanks
#4

found that the500ohm wirewound potentiometer is bad. Not sure if its termed a wirewound but beleive so.You can plainley see inside the pot andwatch the arm rotatearound the wire. What should I use to replace this pot? I can,t seem to locate this pot on the schematic.It is the attenuation control. Are there still some of theses style of pots around? Thanks
#5

Do you think it was added by a previous user? Where in circuit is it connected? If it is in the output a WW pot is not a good choice as it will look like an inductor and may cause some resonance at various frequencies.
Terry

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#6

I agree. Sometimes wirewounds are used instead of carbon pots because they can dissipate more power. I don't have the schematic in front of me, but typical carbon pots can dissipate a half watt, and most wirewounds can dissipate 4 watts or more. The wirewounds last longer, but as has been pointed out can really screw things up at higher frequencies.

Knowing nothing further, and assuming that this was a substitute part, I would just check for anything in the vicinity that may have caused the original control to fail, (other than plain old age.)

I've blown up parts on perfectly good test equipment when connecting it wrongly to a set I was working on a couple of times. So that may have been what happened originally.

As for the trimmer caps, yeah, you gotta take them apart, clean out the crud with deoxit or whatever your favorite solvent is, let everything dry out, and reassemble. The mica chips are really fragile, so take your time. If you ruin one, think unobtanium or scrounge-ola! Good luck.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Ron and Mike I mentioned a 2 meg resistor not on the schematic. I stumbled on a changes note in Riders that mentioned th...dconant — 12:02 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Here you go: Your the code 125Radioroslyn — 11:12 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi Ron, Thanks for the input. I think I'm going to call it good enough. It does seem weird I can usually dial in othe...dconant — 08:01 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome, the radio looks intimating 11 tubes, wish you well.Jimradio — 07:49 AM
462ron
Hi Dan, it’s been 10 years since I restored the electronics on my 37-116 so I’m going on some foggy memories. I remember...462ron — 07:37 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>