Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

41-290 Component Values
#1

I attempting to restore a 41-290 (code 121) and have identified a couple of discrepancies between the as built (as-manufactured) unit and the available schematics. Specifically, item #41 (resistor) is specified as 33K ohms whereas the resistor installed is 100K ohms and item #45 (capacitor) is specified to be .01 mf where as the installed item is .003 mf. As far as I can tell from visual inspection the 100K ohm resistor and the .003 mf cap appear to be as factory built. The following illustration details the discrepancies.

Any thoughts from the members/experts will be appreciated.







Note from site admin: Sorry, but the photos which were attached to this post are no longer available.
#2

This is a production change, documented in the 1941 RMS Year Book.

Models 41-280, Run 7; 41-285, Run 7; 41-287, Run 7, and 41-290, Run 5
To improve the Bass compensation action in the volume control circuit beginning with the above production run numbers, resistor (41) 33,000 ohms was changed to 100,000 ohms, Part No. 33-410339. Condenser (45) .01 mfds., 400 volts was also changed to .003 mfds., 1000 volts Part No. 30-4469.

There is no need to use a 1000 volt capacitor for part (45). 600 volts is overkill, but it is easier to standardize on 600/630 volt capacitors throughout when buying new caps.

Use of an .003 uF cap for part (45) will give your radio thundering bass. An .01 is too large here to be effective enough for bass compensation, thus the change.

I've modified a few Philcos that had 33K or smaller resistors and .01 uF caps in this circuit. I changed them to 68K and .0047 uF. Result: great bass response. Icon_smile YMMV.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Thank you for this information - I'll use the .003mf cap and 100K ohm resistor. New ones of course.

TFB
#4

I suppose that this should apply to the 41-250 and 41-255 as well since they use the same chassis as the 41-280 and 41-285 respectively. Yes?

-David
#5

I just looked; the answer is yes.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
42-345, question for an owner
+1 for number 4 with an added theorem: The more connections in a circuit the higher the possibility of failure.RodB — 12:17 PM
Help with Readrite 410 tube tester
IMHO, Between the transformer common (where you have one lead) and any point on the rotary switch, you should be reading...MrFixr55 — 11:53 AM
Help with Readrite 410 tube tester
This is such a simple looking schematic yet its throwing me off and driving my Fluke DMM crazy. I cant get real voltage ...daveone23 — 11:23 AM
42-345, question for an owner
Rod :lol: 1. The schematic always work according to the wiring. 2. If the schematic does not work according to the wir...morzh — 10:36 AM
42-345, question for an owner
Wow Mike, that's profound! That should be the Phorum motto.RodB — 09:49 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Hi Chas, I hear you. If you happen to be passing NYC vs Philly, I can give it a good home also. @ RadioRoslyn, T...MrFixr55 — 09:25 AM
Bakelite crack repair - what is best epoxy?
I'm with Arran, but I use even stronger epoxy with a 72 hour cure. It is sold to knife makers for bonding wooden handles...DaleHCook — 08:47 AM
42-345, question for an owner
It cannot be wired correctly and work incorrectly. It is as simple as this: if you want to have you treble up and bas...morzh — 08:33 AM
42-345, question for an owner
Welcome to the Phorum, Noel! I don't have that radio, but I'm sure others will jump in with help. Take care and BE HEA...GarySP — 07:52 AM
42-345, question for an owner
Hello,      I am working on a Philco 42-345.  It appears that there have been many hands inside this radio before me....UpNorth — 07:42 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2599 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 2598 Guest(s)
Avatar

>