Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Output transformer
#16

How do you hold it in place? Do you use some wax of some kind?  Did you make some sort of coil winding machine that will lay the fine wire down nicely?

As far as thickness, it was interesting that between layers, there were sometimes 1 layer of paper, other times 2.  Don't know if there was a reason or just carelessness on the part of the operator.
#17

I held the paper in place with shellac (Bullseye brand from the Hardware store). Something similar was used in manufacture. I cut strips the correct width, trimming them to length after wrapping to achieve an overlap of perhaps 1/2 inch. The windings were painted with shellac, and the paper also "pasted" with it.

Yes, I built a coil winder, Please see my 16X thread here in Electronic Restorations for details of the transformer rewind setup. Looking across the 'net, there are a few ideas for this. I found it took quite a bit of experimentation (learning from scratch). The dissection process of the old windings should also be done with care, notes and pictures - once it is gone, it's gone!

I'm happy to answer any more questions you have.

Ed

I don't hold with furniture that talks.
#18

Thanks for the info.  I didn't take pics but counted every winding of every layer and noted the direction of the wind for the primary and secondary.  The number winds, as expected came out very close on either side of the center tap.  I'll examine your coil winder and google it for other ideas as well.
#19

I like your coil winder!  Is that a hand crank on the side or do you motorize it?  Also, do you find that the fine wire will lay without crossing on its own if you keep a very slight angle on it?  I'll be using the 35 gauge wire for the primary as well.  Pretty fine stuff.
#20

Thanks!

Hand crank, for lack of a motor, but that also enabled good control. The wire will lay without crossing if one is careful to set up the bobbin nice and true. It also helps to pack it a little to bulge the sides - this particularly for the first few layers. Once the stack builds up, it tends to have convex rounded surfaces, and the wire takes up with the angle as you say. I also found it helped to put a new paper under the first layer, to smooth the surface.

I don't hold with furniture that talks.
#21

I'm going to try it!  Since I have a new OT for this radio, it's not the end of the world if I totally botch the job.  I just think it would be fun to try.  Wire will be here on Thursday, but it's going to take some time to build a winder.
#22

Success! Finished rewinding the output transformer for the 14.  I didn't really need to since I had purchased a universal replacement that worked fine.  However, My 96 chassis also has a bad output so I thought I would practice on this.

   
   
   

finished product works great. Heck of a lot of work, though. Now I get to do it again for the 96.
#23

neat fix!
Icon_thumbup Icon_thumbup Icon_thumbup
#24

All you Guys,,,,make it look SOOOO,,,easy,,,,,you are killing Me------Nice JOB---CHEERS
#25

Easy!?  that represents probably 3 days work and frustration!  As with many things, it's one thing at a time until all added up, it's done.  Even though that one transformer cost many $$ in time, there is a sense of satisfaction when it's done and it works.  There doesn't seem to be a universal replacement for the 96 output transformer that matches at all closely. So, for it to be correct in the impedance area,  I have to rewind it.  No Doubt, the universal I have would work and no one would hear the difference.  That transformer would look ugly sitting on top of the 96 speaker.  I've already disassembled the 96 transformer so I have all the windings counted.  Hopefully, with the previous practice, this one won't take as long. An advantage of the 96 transformer is that the secondary was inside the primary so I didn't have to unwind it or rewind it.  The harder part is that the primary wire is even finer (37 AWG) than the one I just did (35 AWG).  That much harder to keep the wire from crossing in the layers.  Hopefully it won't go too badly.
#26

I don't think that there were any issues with the quality of Philco output transformers at the time the model 14 was built, that is if the speaker and transformer are the same ages and type as the one that came with the model 14 to begin with. The really crappy output transformers came out in the 1939-42 models, they were usually mounted under the chassis, it's a rare bird to have a model 40-180 style chassis with a good original output transformer, they either have a replacement or an original with an open primary.
Since it was a console chassis apparently it may have had a 10'' "H" type speaker originally, the table version would have had an 8'' "K" type I think. In my opinion the Hammond output transformers, especially the universal ones are overpriced, by far, over what their competitors have on offer, such as Edcor. In a pinch I would have been inclined to search for a NOS replacement, not necessarily a Philco part but a Thordarson or Stancor, or a used one salvaged from a junk chassis or speaker. The impedance isn't really that hard to change on the output side, the secondary windings are towards the outside, undo a few layers of paper and it will be exposed, ready to alter or rewind if necessary.
Regards
Arran
#27

Wow, good job! Icon_thumbup Icon_thumbup

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#28

Thanks Ron.

Arran, I hope you are right about being able to find NOS or replacement by another manufacturer for any future defective output transformers, or PT for that matter, I may run into.  This route is a lot of hassle!  I'm not too up on the impedance changing thing.  I'd have to investigate the math to know how many winds to take off for the secondary.  I'll have to google it to see what I can find.  For now, this is kind of fun, but it will get old quickly.  In past years in the repair of tube type organs, I have run into OT and PT problems and replacements were always available.  I always wondered what it would be like to rewind one.  Now I know.  The customer would never be able to afford that service!
#29

Really nice job!

I don't hold with furniture that talks.
#30

Very nice job. It's really cool and satisfying when you learn something new or accomplish a hard task like you did. Thanks for sharing and inspiring others.

Tony

“People may not remember how fast you did a job, but they will remember how well you did it”




Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Shadow Meter Bulb
Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
3D-printing...short of machining, of course. Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5985 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 5982 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>