Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 18 oscillator coil rewind
#1

Hello all, I have an open secondary winding on my oscillator coil, item #16 in the parts list with a secondary resistance value of 3.4 ohms. I counted 16 turns of original transformer or magnet wire, which is about the size of a human hair. The smallest transformer wire I have is 33 AWG. When I restring the secondary coil with 16 turns as original, I am measuring 1.2 ohms. So, what is more important here, the resistance value (which I think they used as a measuring reference) or the inductive reactance which is how this coil is actually used? I know the number of turns affects the inductance, but I get the wrong value when checked with a vom. Thoughts?? Thanks!!
#2

Inductance trumps the resistance. The resistance is going to be different as your wire size is larger. If you don't have enough turns it won't oscillate at the low end of the band. Coil is used to couple feedback from the cathode to the grid and is not in a resonant circuit.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

So should I go with my rewound coil with 16 turns measuring 1.2 ohms?? Thanks
#4

Forget ohms. Go for the turns. Also if you don't have the proper wire (often gauge 42) I recommend you buy a spool, with 30-s radios comes handy more often than I'd like to see it.
If the coil is not a part of the resonant tank the turns is the only thing that matter.
If it were, than everything would matter, turns, length of winding, thickness etc.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#5

Thanks for the help gents!!!




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Welcome to the Phorum, keithchip! How far you take a radio on cabinet restoration is a matter of personal preference. ...GarySP — 11:28 PM
48-482 rear panel help
I've recently finished the internal restoration of a locally purchased Philco 48-482. The cabinet is in ok shape except ...keithchip — 10:28 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome to the Phorum, Ken! Lots of help here for all of your restoration questions. Take care and BE HEALTHY! - Gar...GarySP — 07:59 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Thank you. I went to your online library and found 2 schematics. I will download and compare to components!Ken D. — 06:31 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
It is a 16B tombstone.morzh — 06:13 PM
Zenith H725
David - sorry, I reread your post and finally saw THD - now the % figures make sense. Thanks for explaining. The PSU...EdHolland — 06:06 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Hi Everyone, New member but have been reading this for awhile for tips! Vaccum tubes were before my time so bear with ...Ken D. — 06:03 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Thank you MrFixR55, I appreciate your comments very much. I do not detect much hum if any so I will be staying with the ...dconant — 05:15 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi DConant Yes, you can replace chokes with resistors.  You do stand the risk of increased hum.  the solution is to inc...MrFixr55 — 04:23 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>