Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

I need a good picture of the Patent Label for a 38-7
#1

I took a picture of the label on my chassis but when I needed it to reproduce a new label, the picture was blurry! I need to be more careful. Can anybody either post a close up or email me a picture of the patent label? Much appreciated.

Crist
#2

Hi Crist,

Any chance it's the same as the 37-xxx models?

I had this photo of the patent label on my 37-116:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B64cfW...DhaNkJadEk

Here's a repro label I created from it:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B64cfW...1VyOEFybm8

[Edit: links have been fixed]
#3

Nathan,
No, it is not the same. I have your label already which I used for my 60B project. It worked very well. what I did was to scan it as a jpeg and then reworked it slightly to have the correct part number. I'll do the same for the 38-7. Except the picture was to blurry to read the numbers! That's why I need a clear picture of the label.
Your stuff is top notch and much appreciated in our hobby. thanks again.

Crist
#4

Oh - that's right. I remember now about your 60B.  Icon_thumbup

So I looked through photos I've saved from various models - found this picture of the patent label from a 38-12:
   

Can you get what you need from that?

And wow you need a magnifying glass to read it - no wonder it's hard to find a good picture of one.
#5

That's it! Thanks. Yeah, a better picture would be great. At least it's a start.
Thanks.

Crist
#6

Hi Christ,
Here is the label off of my 38-7.  It has a lot of brown stains that I can't wipe of, I suspect the paper is stained.  Also, as luck would have it, last week I pushed on the one spot where there is a hollow under the label, and that created the circular tear in the middle.  So I don't know if this is much help, but it definitely is a 37-8.
Let me know if the photo doesn't comes through, I've never posted a photo before.


Attached Files Image(s)
   
#7

Yeah, the picture came through! That's it. I'll use this one as my seed and see what I can come up with.
Thanks.

Crist




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Zenith H725
David - I think I understand but what units are you discussing (Low of 1.7, high of 3.9)? Budget constraints for Ham ...EdHolland — 01:43 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
You're doing great. I wish I could be more involved, but my mind is right now preoccupied with the reason I am here in ...morzh — 12:21 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hope you guys are still with me. I have moved on to the alignment. I completed the IF alignment which was pretty muc...dconant — 10:47 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hello MrFixr55, Thank you for taking the time to explain. I measured 50 volts where you say. Today the 370 volts at ...dconant — 12:51 PM
462ron
Oh that sucks. It’s something easily overlooked. Hopefully it’s nothing more than a resistor! Ron462ron — 08:08 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Just confirmed that you are correct. It’s the function generator. I connected the signal output probe to one of the inpu...jrblasde — 07:52 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Ouch, you may be right. Yes, it is solid state. It’s the signal output of my oscilloscope. May be time to crack that ...jrblasde — 07:27 AM
462ron
If you didn’t put a DC blocking cap between the signal generator probe and the plate of the 1st IF it’s possible you ble...462ron — 07:07 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi DConnant, The reason why C127 is isolated from ground is because sets of this vintage did not have the center tap...MrFixr55 — 01:07 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
The shield is on the 6H6. It was, in fact, a missing jumper to connect the main chassis ground to the RF chassis grou...jrblasde — 10:58 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1036 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1035 Guest(s)
Avatar

>