Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Zenith 6S527 E-cap ?
#1

I have a Zenith 6S527 schematic here
 http://www.nostalgiaair.org/pagesbymodel...025231.pdf



I'm afraid I have screwed up the replacement of the E cap C15, C16 right now all I get is a hum so now I have to sort it out what I did my main question is about the polarity. Is the positive of 15 and 16 go to the field coil and the neg to the K of the 6X5?
#2

No, it is opposite. FC has the minusses and the Cathode has plusses.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

Thanks Morzh,
 wired this up this morning and get nice clean static the hum is completely gone (no stations yet) I will finish the recap.  From the whistling I hear this may need an alignment but see no procedure any ideas where I might find it?

Eric
#4

Find any similar Zenith tube alignment procesdure, like here

http://www.nostalgiaair.org/pagesbymodel...025500.pdf

and use the similar approach.
All superhets are aligned in a similar manner, just location of the trimmers and padders are different.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#5

That is an interesting arrangement, the field coil is parallel connected with the bias resistors on the negative side, in most cases, should they wire the field coil on the negative side it would be in series with the bias resistors, somewhere between the center tap and the chassis. I also noticed that the parts list specs most of the carbon resistors as 1/4 Watt, so you may want to check those over as you replace the paper caps, 1/4 Watts are more likely to drift upward in value then 1/2 Watt resistors, or go open, particularly if used as a plate load resistor such as R10, 220K Ohm. I would also check the bias resistors, R12 and R13, 1/4 Watt rating sounds way too low for those even if they are in parallel with the field coil, in most sets those would be 5 Watts at least.
Regards
Arran
#6

I agree, I never saw that. I am not even sure I like that. But I guess it works.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#7

Radio is done and refinished am works fine with stations up and down the dial but nothing on SW even with an extended antenna. Thing is I can't find alignment data anywhere Rider's doesn't have anybody point me in the right direction on this?

Eric
#8

Eric, if you know the IF is 455 kHz, just put it through and align the IF xfmrs, then just align using low and high limits on the dial.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#9

Thing is under the chassis are 4 trimmers besides the tuner trimmers (also under the chassis ) and the IF's are on top A,B,C&D
So there is 
E wavetrap padder found 
F broadcast padder osc
G    "          ant padder on tuner found.
J broadcast padder
K sw osc on tuner found
M sw padder antenna
Got a print from Radiomuseum and it shows the location of some but not all and no alignment procedure. So this is where I'm at hope to ID the rest and locate then go from there.

Eric
#10

Try this schematic in the link below. The adjustments have the same labels as your model and are in same part of the circuit.

This is one of those models where you align the SW Osc at 18MHZ first followed by the BC band and then SW ant at 16 MHz last. SW Osc should be 455khz above 18 if using a counter. This way the image is 910 KHz below.

I often tune the SW ant for most ambient noise if you don't have a sig gen that goes that high.

I can tell you that if you don't have a good outside antenna, SW is pretty much dead lately. Look for WWV on 10 or 15 as they are a good reliable signal.

Hope this helps.

http://www.nostalgiaair.org/pagesbymodel...025201.pdf

Tony

“People may not remember how fast you did a job, but they will remember how well you did it”
#11

Thanks Tony, This looks like what I'm looking for!

Eric
#12

Hi Eric,

Did it work? Hopefully you’re enjoying the radio now.

Tony

“People may not remember how fast you did a job, but they will remember how well you did it”




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Shadow Meter Bulb
Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
3D-printing...short of machining, of course. Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5613 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5612 Guest(s)
Avatar

>