Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco Transformer Cover
#1

I was wondering why Philco has a cover over the transformer on a 40-150 that I am working on?  I removed it and find a regular old transformer in nice shape I might add.  I was wondering if there was any real reason it is there?  I noticed some pictures of this same radio on the internet that show the cover removed and was thinking the thing would run much cooler exposed to the air.  I was surprised how small this transformer looks vs other radios I have worked on with a similar number of tubes.


Attached Files Image(s)
   

73's  Bob
#2

Just a guess, maybe used for extra shielding.
#3

They aren't really stressed all that much, most of the tubes used in the 40-150, 180, etc are 150 ma loctals rather then the usual 300 ma octals everyone else was using at the time, the exceptions being the #41 output tubes and the 84 rectifier, the B+ voltage was on the low side too, only about 180 volts on the power output tubes. Now why did they use that metal box? I don't know, but it obviously didn't hurt anything as most of this series of chassis still have their original power transformers, however the output transformers are usually dead on arrival if they haven't already been replaced.
Regards
Arran
#4

The OP also asked this question on ARF, and someone there speculated that the cover may have been for magnetic/electrostatic shielding.

Sounds reasonable to me, especially given the close proximity of the loop antenna to the transformer. This may be why the console versions didn't have the cover over the transformer - the loop antenna in the consoles was under the chassis, not directly behind it.

But this is another of those questions that can only be fully answered by dead Philco engineers. And dead men tell no tales, nor do they answer any questions.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Yes some interesting replies,  seems like it was a fairly common practice with other manufactures of that time as well.

73's  Bob




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
It is a 16B tombstone.morzh — 06:13 PM
Zenith H725
David - sorry, I reread your post and finally saw THD - now the % figures make sense. Thanks for explaining. The PSU...EdHolland — 06:06 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Hi Everyone, New member but have been reading this for awhile for tips! Vaccum tubes were before my time so bear with ...Ken D. — 06:03 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Thank you MrFixR55, I appreciate your comments very much. I do not detect much hum if any so I will be staying with the ...dconant — 05:15 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi DConant Yes, you can replace chokes with resistors.  You do stand the risk of increased hum.  the solution is to inc...MrFixr55 — 04:23 PM
Zenith H725
1.7-3.9 %, a modified Sine wave inverter is around 25%. Most generators from big box stores run 10% at a 50% load. What ...David — 04:06 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
I am having a heck of a time doing the alignment on the AM band. I can't seem to dial in the 1500 KC oscillator. I can h...dconant — 03:35 PM
Zenith H725
David - I think I understand but what units are you discussing (Low of 1.7, high of 3.9)? Budget constraints for Ham ...EdHolland — 01:43 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
You're doing great. I wish I could be more involved, but my mind is right now preoccupied with the reason I am here in ...morzh — 12:21 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hope you guys are still with me. I have moved on to the alignment. I completed the IF alignment which was pretty muc...dconant — 10:47 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 728 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 727 Guest(s)
Avatar

>