Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco Transformer Cover
#1

I was wondering why Philco has a cover over the transformer on a 40-150 that I am working on?  I removed it and find a regular old transformer in nice shape I might add.  I was wondering if there was any real reason it is there?  I noticed some pictures of this same radio on the internet that show the cover removed and was thinking the thing would run much cooler exposed to the air.  I was surprised how small this transformer looks vs other radios I have worked on with a similar number of tubes.


Attached Files Image(s)
   

73's  Bob
#2

Just a guess, maybe used for extra shielding.
#3

They aren't really stressed all that much, most of the tubes used in the 40-150, 180, etc are 150 ma loctals rather then the usual 300 ma octals everyone else was using at the time, the exceptions being the #41 output tubes and the 84 rectifier, the B+ voltage was on the low side too, only about 180 volts on the power output tubes. Now why did they use that metal box? I don't know, but it obviously didn't hurt anything as most of this series of chassis still have their original power transformers, however the output transformers are usually dead on arrival if they haven't already been replaced.
Regards
Arran
#4

The OP also asked this question on ARF, and someone there speculated that the cover may have been for magnetic/electrostatic shielding.

Sounds reasonable to me, especially given the close proximity of the loop antenna to the transformer. This may be why the console versions didn't have the cover over the transformer - the loop antenna in the consoles was under the chassis, not directly behind it.

But this is another of those questions that can only be fully answered by dead Philco engineers. And dead men tell no tales, nor do they answer any questions.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Yes some interesting replies,  seems like it was a fairly common practice with other manufactures of that time as well.

73's  Bob




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
As I remember it, the shock from that B+, about 250VDC, felt worse than the shocks I experienced from 220VAC.morzh — 09:14 AM
Hickok 288x
They worked for 85 years as .05's and my other machine which operated perfectly has them. Doubt thats the issue. Yes saf...daveone23 — 09:01 AM
462ron
LOL@ MrFixr. I remember an encounter with my first tube radio.. I think I have posted this before. Back when I knew just...462ron — 08:07 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
I absolutely attribute my reaching 63 to God's benevolence, but this apart, it has never occurred to me to tap anything ...morzh — 07:55 AM
Does the 20 Deluxe use photofinish?
No, it did not use photo-finish. It is veneer with the shading on the front of changing darkness.morzh — 07:52 AM
Philco 66 No Plate Voltage
We could also mention the factory miswire of the tweeters on 38-690. Or the fact that even with this fixed, one could no...morzh — 07:51 AM
462ron
Just a thought here, those caps C33-C34 are .05mfd. That high of a value can possibly pass enough 60hz current to cause ...462ron — 07:37 AM
Hickok 288x
Isnt the chassis and ground the same on this machine? My other 288x that works is an identical machine and it does not h...daveone23 — 07:05 AM
Just got a 49-1613 need to know...everything!
According to the gallery, it has an AM/FM radio, with a two speed phonograph, the 78 side is an automatic changer, the 3...Arran — 01:32 AM
Philco 37-???
During the 1937 and 38 model years Philco was big on the concept of what would now be called a "modular" desig...Arran — 12:23 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3067 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 3066 Guest(s)
Avatar

>