Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Help Refinish 46-1209 Newbee!
#1

i stripped the whole cabinet. i see all kinds of wood and verneer. on top walunt verneer i went to deep in one spot, could have cried. what can i do to hide this mark? top ends look like popler. top band front and sides look like some burl. do i stain first then spray laqueer? can someone steer me in the right direction, before i screw it up. thanks for any HELP. Rich[attachment=2]
#2

Wish you had of ask before you touched it. Do not ever sand on theses old sets. Use stripping compound . I would finish stripping it with some stripeaze ,ect.
then stain again spray ect. Could try to use some restore a finish. But on that gouge will probaly have to sand with some fine sand paper to smooth it out some.
What grit did you use looks like maybe 80 or something . That is a real no no. There will be others jump in on this. Icon_biggrin
Kent.
#3

Agree with all that has been said. Regular sandpaper is only useful on solid wood.

I would try some artist's oils with a very fine brush to touch up the color; when you are happy let it dry for a week, and then mask and spray with tinted laquer to match examples of cabinetry of similar models available on this forum.

It would probably be easier if you ended up with a shade a little darker than the original, as it is the "grey" scale is a little less apparent than the hue. The laquer will adjust the "shine" which can be rubbed down with pumice and water after a few coats, or enhanced with paste wax.

Hope this helps
#4

the mark on top (first pic) is not deep. just thru the verneer. should i stain the whole thing dark and spray laquer? or no stain at all. just tinted laquer? thanks Rich
Icon_redface Icon_redface Icon_redface my bad! ! ! !
#5

I would try to stay with original as possible. On the spot try mixing shades till you get it close. Stain the whole set , then top coat.
But since you started sanding finish it with some fine paper . Only where you have all ready sanded. Main thing take your time. Icon_wink .
Kent. ASK MORE IF NEEDED. Icon_biggrin
#6

Many Thanks, finished Philco pics to come. Rich Icon_razz
#7

There should normally be no need to stain, since the factory did not use stains; they used tinted lacquer.

I see three mistakes here:

1. You should use a good finish remover/stripper instead of sanding a finish off;
2. Never use sandpaper with a low number grit (coarse); and
3. If you must sand, always do so with the grain, never across the grain.

Only extra fine sandpaper on the order of 400 grit or better should ever be used on a radio cabinet, and that only as light sanding after every three or so coats of lacquer to level the finish, not to go through it.

In this case, it looks like you have the choice of either trying to replace veneer where it has been sanded through, or stain just the bad spots, seal, and lacquer the entire cabinet. The spots will always show, unfortunately.

We have toning lacquer available to us today, to replicate the colors originally used at the factory. It can be difficult to find. Do a Google search for Pond Cove Paint; they sell every color Mohawk makes.

These things happen. And I am no refinishing expert by any means. In fact I would rather work on chassis than cabinets.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#8

you say seal, and lacquer the entire cabinet. please explain what type seal do i use? thanks Rich
#9

Sorry...

Lacquer sanding sealer would be good. Mohawk makes this also, and there is a sanding sealer made by Deft that might be easier to find.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#10

Thanks, Ron. Much help. Icon_biggrin




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Can someone tell me if my 42 tubes are connected triode or pentode in fixed or cathode bias? How could I tell by looking...dconant — 10:47 AM
Philco 40-120C Restoration
Hello David, that is great news about the tubes source being local ! Sounds like you got good start on the radio . ...radiorich — 09:41 AM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I've only run into a speaker with an open filed coil twice, and they were on newer speakers from the 1940s. One ...Arran — 12:48 AM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yes, this is my plan for now and what do I got to lose, this is not even the speaker from this radio, but one o...morzh — 10:44 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike;  I would unwrap the field coil, and see if maybe there a break near one of the ends, like where the coil wire att...Arran — 10:23 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
...and this is what I did. I fed a little LT into the screwholes with a small brush, and a little on the rim next to the...morzh — 09:52 PM
Philco 40-120C Restoration
I combined the two 40-120C threads together as we like to keep the discussion of the same radio together. It helps with...klondike98 — 09:36 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
Just checked were I buy tubes price is four dollars. So living in Florid we have a local source for tubes. David    David — 09:14 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
The higher voltage may be due to higher mains voltage. My mains run 120-125AC when the set was new mains would be 110-11...David — 09:09 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
Thank you for your reply. I pulled a speaker from a Philco 41-221 and received the same result. I used a signal tracer t...bluecap — 08:45 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4094 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 4093 Guest(s)
Avatar

>