Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

EMUD German radio vs Zenith C845Y
#1

I'll post it in the 'phinds' thread later, but today I scored a beautiful, already restored EMUD table radio from my buddy up in Canton. He had it redone, but failed to sell it at his shop over this past year, in spite of the price probably being less than what it is worth! Icon_crazy  Anyways, I caved and brought it home, then figured it would be fun to do a little side-by-side comparison of it compared to my still unrestored, but working, Zenith C845Y.
The stats:
EMUD is restored, larger than the Zenith, has three speakers, 7 tubes (if I counted right), has a transformer, includes shortwave, and uses a 6BQ5 as an output.
Zenith is not restored (I only cleaned it up and replaced the two FM tubes), has two speakers (though one is a whopper for a table radio!), its about three quarters the size of the German radio, no shortwave, eight tubes, and uses a 35C5 as an output. Oh, it DOES have AFC for the FM, which the EMUD lacks.

Ok, after playing both radios separately and comparing their performance, I am really surprised how much the Zenith holds its own against what would seem to be a superior German counterpart. The EMUD is more forgiving about the modern FM bass frequency response than the Zenith is, but you can get more bass out of the Zenith at the lower volumes. The Emud can get a good bit louder than the Zenith without distortion on FM, but the Zenith can get close by simply turning the tone control completely over to treble. At normal, daily listening levels, it's almost a wash and I kind of give the Zenith a tiny bit of an edge there. Also, being there is no transformer to overheat, the Zenith is the type of radio you can turn on and practically leave on all day. Don't get me wrong, I love the German radio as well, but once again, the plain, boxy Zenith proves that we shouldn't judge all radios by their covers. Icon_thumbup 

Hope you all like my little comparison I did for fun. Icon_smile

No matter where you go, there you are.
#2

This is without recap?

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

No recap to the Zenith at all. Still on original capacitors and Selenium rectifier. Yes, I want to get that stuff done soon, but right now it plays as well as a restored radio from the late 50's. I think the issue with the EMUD is that the tweeters fire out the sides, leaving most of the sound towards the front handled by the main speaker whereas the Zenith has both the main speaker and tweeter facing forward.

No matter where you go, there you are.
#4

Emud is a solid set, not a Grundig, or Telefunken. So it very much equal to the Z. Interesting to do these things though, thanks for sharing. 

Paul

Tubetalk1
#5

No problem. It was for a bit of fun in any case. Now, since it sat in a back room through our humid summer, I decided to give the controls on the EMUD some cleaning as the treble controls and band select buttons had become scratchy again. After doing that and doing the tube sockets as well, I would say the EMUD has a tiny edge now over the Zenith. It can definitely get LOUD and is a hot performer on FM and really works well on shortwave with just the internal antenna. Definitely amazing as I realized it is really only a six tube unit with the 7th being the eye tube. Of course, performance varies channel to channel and I just cranked the Zenith on our local station and it can still keep up with the EMUD. Also, the Zenith definitely beats on late evening, AM listening. I noticed the EMUD loses pep on AM when the channel power goes down, but the Zenith can actually get our local station clear, something all my radios struggle to do. I guess what I am trying to say is I am rather amazed at what Zenith managed to do with that little 35c5 tube in the C845Y and it's family of table radios. Also, I have $150 in the EMUD, which is restored and only $25 in the unrestored, but still rather good working and looking Zenith. Icon_smile

No matter where you go, there you are.
#6

It's a great idea to do tests of radio receivers from different countries. On my channel in You Tube, I made a series of comparative audio tests of American and German radio. Everyone can get acquainted with the results of my experiments.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL...MkwN6P8HGk
#7

Many of the older North American FM sets have had a cap added to the output circuitry that really impedes the bass response, makes them sound almost muddy, but if you remove it they really liven up. I'm not sure if the 1959 and later brand Zs have this or not since they were aiming for a Hi-Fi market.
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Road Trip for a Philco 46-480
Good morning, folks! I’ve finished the cabinet and the electrical restoration, and have detailed those in their respecti...jrblasde — 10:56 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Arran, Thanks for checking you manuals. I appreciate that. Let me know what you find. PhilPdouglaski — 08:46 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
I have some car radio service manuals, Riders I think (not to be confused with the big blue binders), so I may see if on...Arran — 01:20 AM
Philco model 40-100
Greetings; Here is an update, I found a listing on fleabay for a similar chassis to yours, and it has a photo of what...Arran — 12:58 AM
Philco model 40-100
Greetings; I think I may have found a clue as to what is missing, from a search I made, there is a rear view of the c...Arran — 12:12 AM
Philco model 40-100
I recently acquired a Philco model 40-100 farm (battery) radio. The radio was in very good condition except the red on f...mhamby — 05:59 PM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Hello, Richard the radio is an AC-2687 Studebaker model. The Philco model is S -5323 and the chassis p/n is S-5523Pdouglaski — 11:52 AM
48-482 rear panel help
The 48-482 is an AC only set as well, featuring a power transformer. While the transformer shouldn’t get “hot”, it is ye...jrblasde — 11:12 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
I gave a Chrysler/MoPar car radio from 1954, it was made by Philco, and it uses two chassis, one has the power supply an...Arran — 11:06 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Hello keithchip. You could make a hardboard back for the set, but make sure you provide plenty of ventilation holes in ...GarySP — 11:04 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2302 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 2299 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>