Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

My Philco 16B
#1

Hi
Well I just finished stuffing the caps (black blocks) on my 16B Icon_smile , align the I. F. and the RF (boy that RF is hard to align correctly Icon_confused . The radio is a good performer but Icon_rolleyes The the tone control does not have any effect except all the way clockwise which cuts the Highs. I went over this thing many many times and I know Icon_surprised it is wired correctly the only diff is for a .9 mf I used a .82. Is this normal for the 16B??. My radio had the following .9 , two .25's and a .003 and a four poss shorting switch in the tome control circuit. What to do??
The radio has great audio but the first three position's have no effect.
Joe

Joe Bratcher near Louisville, KY
#2

Hi

The tone control on Philco sets of that era were designed to cut the highs to a greater or less degree.

Hold the phone. I think you have made a mistake. The earliest 16 tone control used a 0.5 and 0.15 uF caps in a metal container, external to the tone control, and .09 and .006 uF caps inside the control. This was changed later to a bakelite block containing two .025 uF caps external to the control (part no. 7653-C), along with .09 and .003 uF caps inside the control.

I think yours should have the .09 uF inside the control along with the .003, not 0.9 uF. Also, the .25 uF caps should be .025 uF.

With cap values that high, it is no wonder the tone control is ineffective except on the last (fourth) position.

With each "click" of the control, the highs should be cut gradually more and more. The control does work as advertised with .09 and two .025 uF caps. You can use 0.1 uF to replace the .09 uF cap.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

HI
Boy howdy, did I make a mistake Icon_mad , my control has a .09 and .003 (78) in the little box and two .025 in the bakelite block (80) Icon_confused . I was sorta sleepy when I wrote that comment, but this is correct Icon_smile . It just don't make much diff on the first three steps (clicks) the fourth cuts the highs pretty good, I guess the vol control could have a bad tap. It looks to me like the first and second "clicks" are for bass boost.. For the .09 I used a .082. I cannot find what code mine is (121 ETC.) My 16 was changing in frequency until I changed out the .0007 and 00125 (17) mica cap (28) it is o k now.
Thanks for answering
Hope you are feeling o k
Joe

Joe Bratcher near Louisville, KY
#4

I'm doing well, thanks.

The change in tone is very gradual, not dramatic, with that tone control circuit. Philco later switched to a different circuit cutting three .003 uF caps in and out of the plate of the first audio tube. That tone control has more noticeable changes from high to low.

If you can find a Model 16 - Code 125 and 126 (4-band) schematic, you will see that tone control circuit. Philco also used it in the late production of the 5-band 16 sets.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Hi Ron
I found that info on the tone control. It uses three .003 caps HMMMMM I may try that on my radio. The only thing is that I like to keep these old radios as orignal as possible, but since it was used in the 16 I guess it would be O K .
Thanks Ron I'm going to bed
take care
Joe

Joe Bratcher near Louisville, KY
#6

I generally try to keep mine as original as possible also, but in recent years I have taken liberties with the tone control at times. Especially with two very rusty chassis I had that some would consider too far gone to salvage - a Model 71 and a Model 89. Both now have potentiometers instead of switches for tone controls, and both have 6A7 1st detectors instead of 36 tubes.

http://www.philcoradio.com/notebook/super71.htm
http://www.philcoradio.com/notebook/super89.htm

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 38-7 Speaker
I have let this one sit because of other duties. Now I am back, and I have a couple of questions. I hooked up a Hammond ...tludka — 05:34 PM
Philco 42-390, code 121 speaker
>>A closer examination of the very small print schematic indicates that the speaker is a PM type. This shows a ...morzh — 05:18 PM
Philco 60 Squealing
Litz is typically tinned by simply rubbing it with the soldering iron tip while immersed in solder (and a bit of rosin f...morzh — 05:14 PM
Philco 6K7
The suppressor grid (if by G3 you mean the S) is usually at the Cathode potential, which in this caes is GND. I am not ...morzh — 05:10 PM
Philco 16B Parts
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately the radio was removed before bidding was over so I didn't get a chance to bid.dconant — 04:10 PM
Philco 16B Parts
Hi Dan, Mike is correct, there's a lot of painted stuff on the chassis but it looks pretty good. The sm is all there,sp...Radioroslyn — 03:50 PM
1930s Stromberg-Carlson Tombstone Radio need help identifying model number
Hi Cap'n Clock, Unfortunately, I do not have this radio.  This is a shame because this should be a good performer.  2A...captainclock1988 — 03:43 PM
Philco 42-390, code 121 speaker
Using a 5W  1.5k  ceramic resistor in place of the field coil and using a 4 ohm PM speaker, I was able to bring the radi...Stevelog — 02:57 PM
Philco 60 Squealing
I have taken out the 2nd IF and found a problem or not. I believe the coils are litz wire. There is a very small strand ...dconant — 02:13 PM
Philco 6K7
I am restoring a Philco 37-60. The am reception is very good, but the shortwave is very weak. Run 6 Philco removes the g...bobbyd1200 — 01:35 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4602 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 4601 Guest(s)
Avatar

>