Another 89 Chasis from H**l!
Posts: 34
Threads: 6
Joined: May 2017
City: Huntington, WV.
Well...got the coils back into the chassis last night. I can now listen to all kinds of static. The unit still will not obtain any stations. I do have a small AM broadcaster that I can broadcast on (3) different frequency's. If I get the transmitter antenna close enough to the IF (44) Control Grid, I get that station. I went back in to check some voltages again. It seems like my plate voltages and Screen Grid voltages are all a bit low. What should be 230-240 on the plate, is really more like 157. Same on the Screen Grid. What should be 90 is more like 55.
On another note, my amplifier stage is all working fine and dandy. Any suggestions??
Posts: 395
Threads: 33
Joined: Jul 2013
City: Horsham, PA
Tom,
Great job rewinding the coils!
If the plate and screen voltages of the RF (44) and the Det/Oscillator (36) tubes are low, you probably have resistors that need to be replaced.
The resistor that will affect the plates of the 44 and 36 tubes is component #20. This should measure 5000 ohms. Many resistors drift high over the years, so check that resistor (and probably replace it if it is more than about 10% high).
The screen voltages of these tubes are controlled by the resistor divider composed of components #47 and #48. These should measure 51K and 39K ohms respectively. If either, or both, of these resistors have drifted significantly, the screen voltage will be affected. You probably need to replace these as well.
Good luck
Posts: 34
Threads: 6
Joined: May 2017
City: Huntington, WV.
Finally got all of the resistors replaced. Even if they weren't out of tolerance, I replaced them. I'm still having the low voltage issues. I'm about to pull my hair out on this one. I also changed the electrolytic caps back to 6.8mf instead of the 10mf that I originally installed when I first got the beast. I knew it wouldn't change anything. I just wanted to get it as close to original as I could. Its a good thing I have my kegerator close to my bench!
Posts: 34
Threads: 6
Joined: May 2017
City: Huntington, WV.
So here are some readings I am getting. I am still looking for some help on this thing.
My rectifier filament voltage is correct @ 5v. The rest of the filament voltages are also correct @6.4v. Plate voltages at my rectifier is @360v. So my power transformer voltages are right where they need to be. As I had stated before, All resistors and caps have been replaced with new. I have gone through the wiring lead by lead and everything is correct.
According to Riders V3-Philco 3-34, I should be reading 230-240 volts on my plates. I am actually reading about 150v. I should be reading 90 from K to SG, and I am getting 55v. What in the world am I doing wrong??
Posts: 34
Threads: 6
Joined: May 2017
City: Huntington, WV.
Eureka!!! Kind of. I pulled one tube at a time and re-energized the chassis. I found that if I remove the output tube (42), the voltages go up to where they need to be. I threw the 42 into my tester (Precision 612), and it tests fine. Any ideas??
Posts: 599
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2014
City: Edmonton AB CA
Sounds like the bias may be off on the 42 tube and its drawing to much current. With the tube installed and the radio powered up check the voltage from pin 4 to ground and let us know what that reading is.
Gregb
Posts: 34
Threads: 6
Joined: May 2017
City: Huntington, WV.
Looks like it is 8.6 volts
Posts: 599
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2014
City: Edmonton AB CA
Seems a little low, should be around 15 volts. Check resistor #43, the large wire wound unit. Off the top of my head I don't recall the values and can't read it on my poor copy of the schematic, sorry. The 42 tube is the one tube that consumes the most current in the radio so the bias needs to be correct or it will upset the whole set.
Gregb
(This post was last modified: 03-02-2019, 07:38 PM by gregb.)
Posts: 34
Threads: 6
Joined: May 2017
City: Huntington, WV.
Resistor #43 is supposed to read 32 ohms and 232 ohms. Actual readings are 33.5 ohms & 240 ohms. Could I remove one of the windings on the 240 ohm part to get it closer to the 232?
(This post was last modified: 03-02-2019, 08:26 PM by tkibler.)
Posts: 599
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2014
City: Edmonton AB CA
No, that is plenty close enough. Do you have another 42 to try, a gassy tube can cause this issue.
Gregb
(This post was last modified: 03-02-2019, 09:30 PM by gregb.)
Posts: 34
Threads: 6
Joined: May 2017
City: Huntington, WV.
I'm going to order one tonight. Stay tuned. Thanks for all the help!!
Posts: 34
Threads: 6
Joined: May 2017
City: Huntington, WV.
Okay guys...I actually had a NOS #42 Output tube in my stock. I found it after I ordered another one . Voltages read the same when the 42 is inserted. Strangely enough, when I read the voltages with the 42 out of the equation, my voltages actually seem to be too high. Here is what I get with the 42 pulled...Is this normal?
#44 (RF) Plate=322v SG=140
#35 (Det) Plate 290v SG=110
#44 (IF) Plate=335 SG=139
#75 (2nd Det) Plate=180
So I removed power, plugged the 42 back in. I put my meter across P to K on the 44(RF) tube. Tuned the beast on. Voltage read 322 for a few seconds then quickly dropped down to 160v. I know the 42 is good. What in the world is going on.
One more tidbit that I found. The speaker that came with this doesn't seem to be original. The field coil is actually around 5k ohms instead of the 1.1k ohms it should be. The voice coil is a bit low as well. It is about 300 Ohms. Doesn't seem like that would affect the voltages though.
Tom
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
The 5K field will definitely affect voltages (almost 5X what it should be, so no wonder B+ is low). A 300 ohm voice coil? Are you sure? That won't affect voltages but will affect volume of your radio.
Your 89 was designed for a speaker with an 1100 ohm field and a roughly 1 ohm voice coil.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 599
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2014
City: Edmonton AB CA
+1
That field coil will be an issue for sure.
Gregb
Posts: 34
Threads: 6
Joined: May 2017
City: Huntington, WV.
Okay. So let me start the search for a new speaker. It a bummer because I had this one re-cone too. It wasnt the voice coil that was 300. It was the primary side of the transformer that feeds the voice coil. I wasnt very descriptive.
Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
Shadow Meter Bulb
|
Mike is correct on the bulb connection, two separate circuits. I found that by rotating the bulb and sliding it forward ...RodB — 12:19 PM |
Hickok AC51 tube tester
|
Cleaned ann contacts, switches and sockets, works great now.martinj — 11:32 AM |
Philco 42-1008 conversion kit
|
I read about a kit to convert the variable speed changer in the Philco 42-1008 into a single speed unit. That would rem...alangard — 09:30 PM |
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
|
Tim
Well...a chassis is metal. Magnetic or not, it does not matter.
A transformer has some hum to it. It is natural. Th...morzh — 08:40 PM |
Hickok AC51 tube tester
|
I thought the 83 tube was bad because it looked white but it tests strong. Blue gassy though. I checked the fuse, it was...martinj — 08:37 PM |
Shadow Meter Bulb
|
Ross
I am not sure what current limiting effect the incandescent provides.
They are two different parts of the sch...morzh — 08:31 PM |
12' Philco
|
Bob
Thanks for that photo.
I have been looking for it, and I cannot find anythinmg on the web.
I forgot it was here...morzh — 08:29 PM |
Shadow Meter Bulb
|
I think after all has been said, I will use the same bulb that is specified for the dial pilot light which is a #55.
I ...georgetownjohn — 07:31 PM |
12' Philco
|
There was also this Philco!
klondike98 — 07:25 PM |
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
|
I expected a challenge and this is just part of it. But, it's also supposed to be fun, entertaining, informative and enj...TV MAN — 07:12 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 3938 online users. [Complete List] » 2 Member(s) | 3936 Guest(s)
|
|
|
|