Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

GE g-97
#1

   
Hello All,
Ive been working on a GE-g97, it's been close to a total rewire due to a Lot of rubber wire. I have it recapped and wired. After initial power up just a slight speaker hum. No reception at all. I have a weak 42 tube im waiting to arrive. But this one wire has me scratching my head on the field coil. I don't see anywhere it would go and seems strange to leave the factory like that. hmm?
#2

Hello GE -

Tough to tell from your photo, but could that wire be an unused center tap on the secondary? What does the schematic indicate?
#3

    I think your right, i haven't seen where they just leave it hanging loose before.
#4

seems to me a wire hanging out like that would act like an antenna ,, helping more noise and local distortion to get in...
#5

Assuming a F96 & F97 are at least similar, field coil is in the power supply filtering ripple.

   

What's shown on schematic of 42 output is output transformer, humbuck winding & voice coil. You should measure resistances to determine just what purpose the loose wires serve, I'd suspect are to humbuck winding. It's resistance is listed as .2 ohm, while field coil is 880 ohms. Output transformer primary is 500 ohm and secondary .8 ohm.

Note the hum buck winding isn't absolutely required, will operate bypassed though probably with increased hum level. Polarity of that winding determines if hum is reduced or actually increased.


Attached Files Image(s)
   

Tom
#6

The f-96 and G-97 are very similar, ive been working off both schematics. The humbuck winding is a separate set of winding's ( thanks! Ive been wondering what those leads were doing). All of my resistances are within spec. The loose wire is .8 ohms which is in line with the center tap on the drawing. So I guess its possible it was built that way. I have a faulty candohm and Im waiting for my power resistors to come in to rebuild that part of the circuit, it should come to life after that, hopefully..
#7

I got the candohm problem sorted out, Speaker has a hum, But no response to dial or anything, I injected a signal on the blue wire (see diagram above) going to output transformer, and I can just make out the tone if I stick my ear into the speaker cone. If Im correct that is pointing towards a problem in my output transformer. which is strange since the resistance measurements where correct. Am I on the right track here?
#8

You'd need a very large signal to push any real amount of volume through the plate(blue) lead.

Can you get anything from the control grid(pin 4)?

http://www.nj7p.org/Tubes/SQL/Tube_query.php?Type=42

Tom
#9

No sound on pin 4 either, I can hear it picking up broadcast but it's VERY faint.
#10

What are 42 voltages on pins 2, 3 & 5?

Tom
#11

275, 255, 15 respectively
#12

Can you inj signal from center tap of volume control? Volume approx half advanced.

Tom
#13

negative, no signal
#14

Ummm, how about injecting signal into pin 4 of 42? If that isn't passing signal problem definitely in output section.

Are you sure the output transformer primary(blue, 500 ohm) is connected to plate and not one of other windings?

Tom
#15

    I started investigating the speaker and output transformer again and I made a few discoveries. On the connector where the "green" wire attaches the solder and wire are missing from the pin. (see Picture) also when I took my initial resistance readings I made an error. Where the schematic is showing 5 ohms across the speaker leads I have .9.. So it looks like I'm on the hunt for a new output transformer.

Ryan




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
RCAs ain't no cake either.morzh — 10:32 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
After a couple of days worth of troubleshooting my signal generator, I gave up. The oscilloscope still worked fine, so I...jrblasde — 09:51 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Yes, I can confirm. I bought one (haven’t restored it yet) which didn’t have a back panel.jrblasde — 09:37 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Try a 39-116.Radioroslyn — 09:24 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
I remember Philco 45 being awkward. If I am not mistaking it for some other set. I think there is a phenolic board, or e...morzh — 08:49 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
If you want a radio that's difficult to work on, get a 37-620. The one side of the chassis is packed pretty tightly and ...Greg — 07:29 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>