Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 144 question
#1

Ron, hope you or some of the other members can help: I have a Philco 144 that had the 2d if transformer replaced with what appears to be a siilvertone item. Has continuity but I believe value is wrong. (correct part# is 32-1306). Besides the correct choke, are there other options out there to replace the "wrong" choke in the 144???? Color me hopeful.

Tom
#2

Well, let's see...

Both the 44 and 144 used the same filter choke, Part No. 5930. 100 H, 10 mA, 2100 ohms DC resistance.

Options?

1. Find one in a junk 44 or 144. I'm not aware of any other Philco models that used that choke. Models 29 and 45 used a similar choke, Part No. 32-7018 (70 H, 10 mA, 2300 ohms DC resistance). This would probably work OK in the 44/144 circuit.
2. Use a substitute - Hammond makes chokes; none are exact replacements, but it appears HC-154E might be in the ballpark. The inductance in henrys is a lot lower then the original (20 H), but the DC resistance is close (1666 ohms). An increase in the value of the output filter capacitor (71) should take care of any increase in ripple.
3. Have Heyboer Transformer custom wind one for you.
4. Use a 2200 ohm resistor instead, increasing the size of the output filter (71) from 6 to 22 uF. The wattage of this resistor would need to be calculated.

I have a freshly refinished 144B cathedral cabinet, and a 44 chassis to put in it. The 44 will be converted to a 144 by changing a few components and adding a shadow meter. It is also missing its filter choke, and I'm thinking about going the resistor route. Philco used resistors instead of chokes in similar circuits in some of their 1937 models; the 37-650 comes to mind as an example.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Maybe I read your post wrong; are you asking about a filter choke or the 2nd IF transformer?

If you can find a junk Model 34, it will yield the IF transformers you want. I might even have a 2nd IF from one; I will look and see.

Any 460 kc IF that will fit should work okay; but for authenticity, you'll want one from a 34 or 144.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#4

Thanks, Ron: yes, the 2d IF p/n 32-1306 is the one I need. Philco 34s and 44/144s are hard to come by in any condition. I have a 34 on display, interestingly it came in the flat face cabinet similar to the one the later Philco 44s came in, not the one similar to the one the 118B cathedral came in. I probably shouldnt mention this, as you may change your mind about harvesting the choke from your 34 chassis, but I have an extra 34 cabinet- the one like the 118B........
HOWEVER, I am interested in your transformer if you choose to part with it.

FYI: just took some pics of some of the collection, incl the "super" 116B and the 1934 16B cabinet with the 1935 16B chassis.

Color me tired of using the crappy mouse on this tiny notebook (dell latitude 430)

Tom
#5

Oh yes, one more thing: I get my schematics from nostalgia air and your website. Problem I encounter is, like in this case, there are no resistance/inductance values listed for the chokes. Understand how you got the freq value,but where can I go to obtain similar info to what you had in your previous response? Sure would make solving problems like this 144 a lot easier......
#6

Watch eBay for Philco Parts Catalogs. I obtained the info for the chokes from the 1935 Philco catalog. The info was not in the 1941 catalog, and I did not look in the 1946 catalog I have.

Old Philco parts catalogs come in handy for things like this.

You have an empty 34B cabinet, eh? Well, it just so happens that I have a pristine 34 chassis, so this could be something useful to me. Icon_smile Don't worry, the pristine 34 chassis is not the one I will be taking parts from. I have another 34 chassis that was radically changed around, then partially junked. I'm pretty sure it still has all three IF cans on it, though. I will try to check tomorrow or Saturday.

I for one would like to see the pictures of your Philcos...I'm sure others here would like to see them also.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#7

I just got the cabinet at the show that was in Mesquite, TX last 21/22 nov. Its in pretty good shape, someone had "refinished" it and it needs toner applied to make the color correct. I'll send pics along with commentary. MUCH better than what the 44 was in when you started your refinish you detailed in the Phorum.
#8

Hello, Ron: I emailed you a few pics of my collection last night. Let me know what you think.
#9

TA Forbes Wrote:Oh yes, one more thing: I get my schematics from nostalgia air and your website. Problem I encounter is, like in this case, there are no resistance/inductance values listed for the chokes.......

Hi TA,

Obviously you are not aware of my website, The Philco Repair Bench.
I offer a photocopy service from ORIGINAL Philco service bulletins for
models from 1928 up thru 1947. See the details on the Schematic Info
page on my site at the URL below to see what a typical packet comprises.

Much more comprehensive and detailed that a Riders scan, from other sources.

Happy Holidays,
Chuck
#10

TA Forbes Wrote:I just got the cabinet at the show that was in Mesquite, TX last 21/22 nov. Its in pretty good shape, someone had "refinished" it and it needs toner applied to make the color correct. I'll send pics along with commentary. MUCH better than what the 44 was in when you started your refinish you detailed in the Phorum.

Yes, you're right...it is in MUCH better shape than that 44 I attempted to refinish recently.

Will send email about this.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I've only run into a speaker with an open filed coil twice, and they were on newer speakers from the 1940s. One ...Arran — 12:48 AM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yes, this is my plan for now and what do I got to lose, this is not even the speaker from this radio, but one o...morzh — 10:44 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike;  I would unwrap the field coil, and see if maybe there a break near one of the ends, like where the coil wire att...Arran — 10:23 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
...and this is what I did. I fed a little LT into the screwholes with a small brush, and a little on the rim next to the...morzh — 09:52 PM
Philco 40-120C Restoration
I combined the two 40-120C threads together as we like to keep the discussion of the same radio together. It helps with...klondike98 — 09:36 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
Just checked were I buy tubes price is four dollars. So living in Florid we have a local source for tubes. David    David — 09:14 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
The higher voltage may be due to higher mains voltage. My mains run 120-125AC when the set was new mains would be 110-11...David — 09:09 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
Thank you for your reply. I pulled a speaker from a Philco 41-221 and received the same result. I used a signal tracer t...bluecap — 08:45 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
Have you tried a different speaker? How did you trace the distortion? How do you know it is weak? What is the reference?...morzh — 08:33 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Amen to that! Every time I think I’ve captured them all, I realize that there’s another error. My goal is to finish with...jrblasde — 07:00 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2994 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2992 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>