Posts: 204
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Newark, Ohio
I found that the Plate detector performs very good with a low modulation source. Using my AM transmitter with the audio input low, there was no distortion with music or speech using the Plate detector.
Possibly when these radios were new, the transmitted modulation level was lower than what it is today?
Ed
Posts: 15,444
Threads: 539
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ
That can be explained.
The plate detector works essentially as a tuned C-class amplifier.
While fairly linear at the top, it curves at the bottom and so with low amplitude signal the result is distorted as it is at the bottom of the curve.
However the whole range is not exactly linear and so the lower the modulation, the less it gets from the particular point at the curve so it gathers less distortion, as the smaller part of any curve one cuts out, the closer it is to a line.
People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
Posts: 204
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Newark, Ohio
OK,that explains the function of a Plate detector but it doesn't answer my question.
Were modulation levels lower in the 30's compared to what they are today?
Why do Plate detectors sound normal using a AM transmitter with low audio input?
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Seems I read somewhere once that modulation levels were lower back then. Certainly, back then you didn't have stations trying to peak all of their programming at 100%+ modulation as has been the practice for the last several years (last few decades?) in broadcasting.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 15,444
Threads: 539
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ
That could also explain some of it.
People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
Posts: 1,184
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2017
City: Allendale, MI
I was just reading a bit of information on WLW's flame thrower transmitter back in the 30's. The indication was given that they could achieve 100% modulation and the implication was that that was unusual. So maybe 100% was rare. I was also looking at the 35 tube data from Cunningham. They gave a sample superhet schematic using 35's. Low and behold, there was the plate detector/amplifier. I guess I can't blame Philco engineers if everyone was doing it!
Posts: 816
Threads: 25
Joined: Mar 2014
City: Louisville, KY
I have been studying that modification to the 70 that you posted. That was one of your best posts to me so far. I do watch for yours.
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Jake
Please, do not give me credit for that. Let's give credit where credit is due - to Ed Locker for the mod and drawing. I merely posted the drawing for Ed.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 816
Threads: 25
Joined: Mar 2014
City: Louisville, KY
Yes sir.
We should at least give you credit for posting it....it's the first I've heard of it, and it inspires all sorts of inferences.
Posts: 15,444
Threads: 539
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ
It's an extensive one. The volume regulator stopped being an antenna attenuator and cathode bias changer and became a regular part of the detector circuit, and the plate detector became 1st AF.
Good few hours at the workbench.
People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
Posts: 204
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Newark, Ohio
At the time I came up with that circuit, I didn't know there was a Triode with diode plates and a 2.5V filament.
I later heard of the 2A6 after I drew the mod. My head was hurting after it all, so I said the heck with it and stayed with the 1N34 diode.
Shhh.......no one will ever know.
Ed
And yes, we do miss you, Ron!
Posts: 816
Threads: 25
Joined: Mar 2014
City: Louisville, KY
"Shhh.......no one will ever know." [Image: https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/sm...on_shh.gif]
<chuckle>
(This post was last modified: 05-15-2019, 01:18 PM by Jake Blake.)
Posts: 15,444
Threads: 539
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ
Well ... a small diode is inconspicuous, could be easily hidden and allows to keep the tube count which does preserve the authentic look. And with one diode vs many tubes that still leaves it at being a tube radio. ![Icon_smile Icon_smile](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Speaking of which, a semiconductor detector is as old as the tube one. Actually older. It's just it did not assume the shape of a small diode for a while and was made of lead and sulfur and not Germanium.
People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
Posts: 15,444
Threads: 539
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ
As was noted privately, we seem to be hijacking this thread and probably should ask the moderator to move this part into the proper thread.
People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
Posts: 816
Threads: 25
Joined: Mar 2014
City: Louisville, KY
"...The volume regulator stopped being an antenna attenuator..."
From my grasp of the circuit , ( which isn't good), that seemed a little silly, trying to insert resistance between the antenna and the first stages. The majority of attenuation ( or perhaps I should say 'gain'), appears to be accomplished by the grounding of the cathode of that 3rd 24. But like you, I would have thought our interests in "authenticity" would lead to a substitute of a triode tube with those twin diode sections,. . . NOT (GASP!), a semi-conductor in a 90-year-old radio! [Image: https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/sm...on_eek.gif]
(This post was last modified: 05-15-2019, 02:05 PM by Jake Blake.)
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
PT-6 antenna connections
|
Notice in the schematic the notch at the bottom of the antenna coil is between pins 3 & 4.
Yes, pin 6 of the 7C6 is...RodB — 07:34 PM |
bridkarl
|
I have two PT-6 chassis. On both there is a blue wire that runs from the above chassis transformer to pin 6 of 7C6. So t...bridkarl — 07:23 PM |
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
|
Joseph, now you are an engineer!!RodB — 06:37 PM |
PT-6 antenna connections
|
Hi, reading your explanation I can see the confusion. If you take it one connection at a time it should result in a desi...RodB — 06:34 PM |
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
|
It works! I received the PCBs this morning in the mail, and put everything together. I reused the base from the original...jrblasde — 04:32 PM |
PT-6 antenna connections
|
I seem to have lost my way on this PT-6.
I see the antenna aerial transformer schematic - I’m reading pins 1 through ...bridkarl — 12:30 PM |
40-150 General questions
|
Good thing you're a good electrician ... the pictures show a lot of rewiring in your future! Take care and BE HEALTHY!...GarySP — 11:52 AM |
40-150 General questions
|
I think RobB has it right. It is a part number and looks like its stamped on the chassis and that wasn't something you ...klondike98 — 11:41 AM |
40-150 General questions
|
It's most likely a part number. Most of Philco part numbers are in that format. I looked at the parts list for this mode...RodB — 08:10 AM |
40-150 General questions
|
Hi Kevin,
No, I don't but I like your Quote about being a good electrician. The way I look at it is "The fact ...MrFixr55 — 08:06 AM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 2742 online users. [Complete List] » 3 Member(s) | 2739 Guest(s)
|
|
|
![>](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/bootbb/asb/right_arrow.png)
|